Cited by 0Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Replay of behavioral trajectories in the medial prefrontal cortex during rule switching

Kaefer, Karola·2019·Intrinsic Activity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25006/ia.7.s1-a3.25

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence for hippocampus-independent replay in extrahippocampal sites, e.g., in superficial layers of medial entorhinal cortex and prefrontal cortex.

    “There is, however, also evi-dence for hippocampus-independent replay in extrahippocampal sites, e.g., in superficial layers of medial entorhinal cortex and in prefrontal cortex.”

    From Sleep—A brain-state serving systems memory consolidation (2023) · cites this paper as [98]

Authors
Kaefer, K.
Corresponding author
Kaefer, Karola
Venue
Intrinsic Activity
Published
2019-09-11
Volume
7
Issue
Suppl. 1
Pages
A3.25
ISSN
2309-8503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967458203
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intrinsic Activity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, rule switching, behavioral trajectories, replay, cognitive control, working memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review