The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement
Open accessAbstract
Background/Purpose: Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary teams are increasingly encouraged in health research, services, education and policy. This paper is the second in a series. The first discussed the definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness of multiple disciplinary teamwork. This paper continues to examine the promotors, barriers, and ways to enhance such teamwork. Methods: The paper is a literature review based on Google and MEDLINE (1982-2007) searches. “Multidisciplinarity”, “interdisciplinarity”, “transdisciplinarity” and “definition” were used as keywords to identify the pertinent literature. Results: The promotors of teamwork success include: good selection of team members, good team leaders, maturity and flexibility of team members, personal commitment, physical proximity of team members, the Internet and email as a supporting platform, incentives, institutional support and changes in the workplace, a common goal and shared vision, clarity and rotation of roles, communication, and constructive comments among team members. The barriers, in general, reflect the situation in which the promotors are lacking. They include: poor selection of the disciplines and team members, poor process of team functioning, lack of proper measures to evaluate success of interdisciplinary work, lack of guidelines for multiple authorship in research publications, language problems, insufficient time or funding for the project, institutional constraints, discipline conflicts, team conflicts, lack of communication between disciplines, and unequal power among disciplines. Conclusion: Not every health project needs to involve multiple disciplines. Several questions can help in deciding whether a multiple disciplinary approach is required. If multiple disciplinarity is called for, eight strategies to enhance multiple disciplinary teamwork are proposed. They can be summarised in the acronym TEAMWORK - Team, Enthusiasm, Accessibility, Motivation, Workplace, Objectives, Role, Kinship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The American Psychological Association
Langfeld, H. S. (1919) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.49.1254.51 · Cited by 7,475
Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1984) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/00006216-198400830-00014 · Cited by 4,216
Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780198570295.001.0001 · Cited by 1,920
The Nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-2962 · Cited by 1,466
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association: BOOK REVIEW
Yao, R. (2011) · Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02081.x · Cited by 1,451
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationThe significance of disciplinary differences
Becher, T. (1994) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007 · Cited by 912
Can scientists and policy makers work together?: Table 1
Choi, B. C. K., Pang, T., Lin, V., Puska, P., Sherman, G., Goddard, M., Ackland, M. J., Sainsbury, P., Stachenko, S., Morrison, H., et al. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.031765 · Cited by 393
Self-citationDevers, K. J. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 369
The Potential of Transdisciplinarity
Gibbons, M., & Nowotny, H. (2001) · Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8419-8_7 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review
Abu-Rish, E., Kim, S., Choe, L., Varpio, L., Malik, E., White, A. A., Craddick, K., Blondon, K., Robins, L., Nagasawa, P., et al. (2012) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.715604 · Cited by 440
Facilitating Healthy Coping in Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Thorpe, C. T., Fahey, L. E., Johnson, H., Deshpande, M., Thorpe, J. M., & Fisher, E. B. (2013) · The Diabetes Educator · doi:10.1177/0145721712464400 · Cited by 155
Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: barriers and frontiers
HICKS, C. C., FITZSIMMONS, C., & POLUNIN, N. V. C. (2010) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892910000822 · Cited by 109
Green, D. M., Taddeo, C. M., Price, D. A., Pasenidou, F., & Spears, B. A. (2022) · International Journal of Bullying Prevention · doi:10.1007/s42380-022-00118-w · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P.
- Venue
- Clinical and Investigative Medicine
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E224-E232
- ISSN
- 0147-958X (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2353
- OpenAlex
- W2143630684
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950
- The paper
- Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2007). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.