The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review
Open accessAbstract
There is a pressing need to redesign health professions education and integrate an interprofessional and systems approach into training. At the core of interprofessional education (IPE) are creating training synergies across healthcare professions and equipping learners with the collaborative skills required for today's complex healthcare environment. Educators are increasingly experimenting with new IPE models, but best practices for translating IPE into interprofessional practice and team-based care are not well defined. Our study explores current IPE models to identify emerging trends in strategies reported in published studies. We report key characteristics of 83 studies that report IPE activities between 2005 and 2010, including those utilizing qualitative, quantitative and mixed method research approaches. We found a wide array of IPE models and educational components. Although most studies reported outcomes in student learning about professional roles, team communication and general satisfaction with IPE activities, our review identified inconsistencies and shortcomings in how IPE activities are conceptualized, implemented, assessed and reported. Clearer specifications of minimal reporting requirements are useful for developing and testing IPE models that can inform and facilitate successful translation of IPE best practices into academic and clinical practice arenas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960
Self-citationAudit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Public Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_436 · Cited by 4,527
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3 · Cited by 1,946
Health professions education: a bridge to quality
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3474 · Cited by 1,783
The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks
D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500082529 · Cited by 1,456
Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 1,206
A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9
Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701682576 · Cited by 1,163
Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., & Gilligan, C. (2013) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.006 · Cited by 382
Cited by
A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39
Reeves, S., Fletcher, S., Barr, H., Birch, I., Boet, S., Davies, N., McFadyen, A., Rivera, J., & Kitto, S. (2016) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2016.1173663 · Cited by 1,081
Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review
Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007 · Cited by 399
Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 3: Evaluating interprofessional education
Reeves, S., Boet, S., Zierler, B., & Kitto, S. (2015) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.1003637 · Cited by 193
Self-citationTackling wicked problems: how theories of agency can provide new insights
Varpio, L., Aschenbrener, C., & Bates, J. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13160 · Cited by 75
Self-citationNagel, D. A., Penner, J. L., Halas, G., Philip, M. T., & Cooke, C. A. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu-Rish, E., Kim, S., Choe, L., Varpio, L., Malik, E., White, A. A., Craddick, K., Blondon, K., Robins, L., Nagasawa, P., Thigpen, A., Chen, L.-L., Rich, J., & Zierler, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-08-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 444-451
- ISSN
- 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9567
- OpenAlex
- W1970829929
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 31.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/13561820.2012.715604
- The paper
- Abu-Rish, E., Kim, S., Choe, L., Varpio, L., Malik, E., White, A. A., Craddick, K., Blondon, K., Robins, L., Nagasawa, P., Thigpen, A., Chen, L.-L., Rich, J., & Zierler, B. (2012). Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.715604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
