Association of Summer Bridge Program Outcomes With STEM Retention of Targeted Demographic Groups
Abstract
Retention of students to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) major has been studied for four cohorts participating in a summer bridge program supported by the National Science Foundation. Students participated in a 6-week program prior to their first term of enrollment at a research-intensive land grant university. Comparisons to baseline incoming classes from 2009–2011 show gains in retention to major out to the third year for underrepresented minorities (African American, Hispanic, Native American), first-generation college students, and females. Gains for underrepresented minorities and females are statistically significant, whereas those for first-generation students are not. These gains are associated with participation in a 6-week summer bridge program and the resulting improvement in preparation for college coursework, sense of belonging as measured by qualitative surveys, and use of academic support structures. Qualitative data support the theory that students need social integration and a sense of belonging in addition to academic support structures to persist in STEM. We conclude that bridge programs should address the “whole student” and not simply academic coursework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fourth STEM bridge program used a pre-post survey design but only provided the post survey score in the published report.
“while the fourth program used a pre–post survey design, although they only provided the post survey score in the published report (Tomasko et al., 2013, 2016).”
From Building Better Bridges into STEM: A Synthesis of 25 Years of Literature on STEM Summer Bridge Programs (2017) · cites this paper as Tomasko et al., 2016
The other STEM bridge program assessed students' written responses to open-ended questions about the impact of the program and coded for evidence of student sense of belonging.
“The other study assessed students’ written responses to open-ended questions about the impact of the program and coded for evidence of student sense of belonging (Tomasko et al., 2013, 2016).”
From Building Better Bridges into STEM: A Synthesis of 25 Years of Literature on STEM Summer Bridge Programs (2017) · cites this paper as Tomasko et al., 2016
Tomasko et al. (2016) compared the treatment of all university STEM-major students and also compared it to all underrepresented STEM-major students.
“Tomasko et al. (2016) compared the treatment of all university STEM-major students and also compared it to that of all underrepresented STEM-major students.”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Tomasko et al. (2016)
Cites
College Students' Sense of Belonging
Strayhorn, T. L. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203118924 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ashley, M., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.17-05-0085 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Pearson, J., Giacumo, L. A., Farid, A., & Sadegh, M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12050333 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Tomasko, D. L., Ridgway, J. S., Waller, R. J., & Olesik, S. V.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- ORCID
- Olesik, Susan V.
- Venue
- Journal of College Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 90-99
- ISSN
- 0047-231X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2343143140
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The journal of college science teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- summer bridge programs, STEM retention, underrepresented minorities, first-generation college students, women in STEM, sense of belonging, academic support, social integration, land-grant universities, college readiness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review