Cited by 13Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsEngineering Technology and Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechatronic Concept of Heavy Machine Tools

Open access
Janda, Petr·2018·DAAAM Proceedings

Abstract

Frequently discussed topic related to the modern trend of Industry 4.0 is the issue of virtual commissioning.This paper focuses on the development of a virtual model (the so-called digital twin) of a real heavy machine tool.In the field of heavy machine tools, this topic is completely new.The paper contains a general description of this issue and the short review of the works dealing with this topic.The development of the virtual model is realized in the Siemens NX environment using the Sinumerik 840D control system.The digital twin is used to test machine parameters.This work is an introductory step for the implementation of the virtual commissioning methodology in the development of heavy machine tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.093

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital twins monitor a machine tool.

    “monitoring a machine tool [30,31]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction and section 3 describe a digital twin of a heavy machine tool, so the paper supports that connection. The paper describes using the twin to test machine parameters and for virtual commissioning, however, not to monitor the operating machine; the Conclusion says measurements on the real machine and comparison with the model are future work. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In most reviewed cases, DT are developed on a single scope level.

    “but in most of the cases DT are usually developed on a single scope level, i.e. [24,30,31].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Janda, P.
Corresponding author
Janda, Petr
Venue
DAAAM Proceedings
Published
2018
Pages
0645-0652
ISSN
1726-9679 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903938668
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of DAAAM for ... & proceedings of the ... International DAAAM Symposium (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Library (University of West Bohemia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
Keywords
heavy machine tools, digital twin, virtual commissioning, mechatronics, Siemens NX, SINUMERIK 840D, Industry 4.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review