The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale
Open accessAbstract
Binder is an open source web service that lets users create sharable, interactive, reproducible environments in the cloud.It is powered by other core projects in the open source ecosystem, including JupyterHub and Kubernetes for managing cloud resources.Binder works with pre-existing workflows in the analytics community, aiming to create interactive versions of repositories that exist on sites like GitHub with minimal extra effort needed.This paper details several of the design decisions and goals that went into the development of the current generation of Binder. Index Terms-cloud computing,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
Baker, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/533452a · Cited by 4,209
Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations
Ross, A. S., Hughes, M. C., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/371 · Cited by 515
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility
Stodden, V., Seiler, J., & Ma, Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708290115 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization
Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2 · Cited by 498
State of the field in multi-omics research: from computational needs to data mining and sharing
Krassowski, M., Das, V., Sahu, S. K., & Misra, B. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.610798 · Cited by 351
The abTEM code: transmission electron microscopy from first principles
Madsen, J., & Susi, T. (2021) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13015.1 · Cited by 264
Visualization of Brain Statistics With R Packages ggseg and ggseg3d
Mowinckel, A. M., & Vidal-Piñeiro, D. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920928009 · Cited by 259
(2019) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372862 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Jupyter, P., Bussonnier, M., Forde, J., Freeman, J., Granger, B., Head, T., Holdgraf, C., Kelley, K., Nalvarte, G., Osheroff, A., Pacer, M., Panda, Y., Perez, F., Ragan-Kelley, B., & Willing, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference
- Publisher
- SciPy
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 113-120
- ISSN
- 2575-9752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886900553
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 88.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25080/majora-4af1f417-011
- The paper
- Jupyter, P., Bussonnier, M., Forde, J., Freeman, J., Granger, B., Head, T., Holdgraf, C., Kelley, K., Nalvarte, G., Osheroff, A., Pacer, M., Panda, Y., Perez, F., Ragan-Kelley, B., & Willing, C. (2018). Binder 2.0 - Reproducible, interactive, sharable environments for science at scale. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-4af1f417-011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
