Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization

Open access
Allen, Micah, Poggiali, Davide, Whitaker, Kirstie, Marshall, Tom Rhys, van Langen, Jordy, Kievit, Rogier A.·2021·Wellcome Open Research

Abstract

Across scientific disciplines, there is a rapidly growing recognition of the need for more statistically robust, transparent approaches to data visualization. Complementary to this, many scientists have called for plotting tools that accurately and transparently convey key aspects of statistical effects and raw data with minimal distortion. Previously common approaches, such as plotting conditional mean or median barplots together with error-bars have been criticized for distorting effect size, hiding underlying patterns in the raw data, and obscuring the assumptions upon which the most commonly used statistical tests are based. Here we describe a data visualization approach which overcomes these issues, providing maximal statistical information while preserving the desired ‘inference at a glance’ nature of barplots and other similar visualization devices. These “raincloud plots” can visualize raw data, probability density, and key summary statistics such as median, mean, and relevant confidence intervals in an appealing and flexible format with minimal redundancy. In this tutorial paper, we provide basic demonstrations of the strength of raincloud plots and similar approaches, outline potential modifications for their optimal use, and provide open-source code for their streamlined implementation in R, Python and Matlab (https://github.com/RainCloudPlots/RainCloudPlots). Readers can investigate the R and Python tutorials interactively in the browser using Binder by Project Jupyter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. M Allen, 2018, RainCloudPlots tutorials and codebase (Version v1.0)., Zenodo.
  2. A Ellison, 1993, Exploratory data analysis and graphic display., Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments., 14-45
  3. N Phillips, 2016, The pirate plot (2.0)—the RDI plotting choice of R pirates., R Bloggers.
  4. J Tukey, 1970, Exploratory Data Analysis, limited preliminary edition, three volumes, 71, 293-316

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A.
Venue
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2021-01-21
Volume
4
Pages
63
ISSN
2398-502X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285508994
Cited by
498
References
17
FWCI
28.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N510129/1)
  • Horizon 2020 (Grantagreementno754513)
  • Wellcome Trust (107392)
  • Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond
  • Lundbeckfonden Fellowship (R272-2017-4345)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2
The paper
Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A. (2021). Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.