The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Detumbling of a Rigid Spacecraft
Abstract
In this paper, a control law that detumbles a spacecraft with magnetic actuators only is developed. A rigorous mathematical proof of global asymptotic convergence from arbitrary initial tumbling conditions to zero angular velocity in a time-varying magnetic field is derived. Furthermore, a simple criterion for determining a reasonable value of the control gain is developed. The selected gain results in a quasi-minimum time detumbling for different initial conditions, in the presence of magnetic coil saturation. Performance of the proposed detumbling control law is demonstrated by numerical simulations on a large set of test cases using a Monte Carlo approach.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In agreement with [Avanzini and Giulietti, 2012], although global asymptotic stability to a zero absolute angular rate is not attainable by means of the considered control law (Eq. [18]), it is possible to reduce the spacecraft's angular rate to a value of the same order as the orbit rate (~0.06 º/s ).”
From 3CAT-2: Attitude Determination and Control System for a GNSS-R Earth Observation 6U CubeSat Mission (2016) · cites this paper as Avanzini and Giulietti, 2012
Citations
Cites
Slotine, J.-J. E., & Li, W. (1991) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 18,975
Rajamani, R. (2011) · Mechanical engineering series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1433-9 · Cited by 4,610
SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE DETERMINATION AND CONTROL
Wertz, J. B. (1978) · Cited by 1,315
Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Sidi, M. J. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815652 · Cited by 1,147
Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control
(1998) · Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1108/aeat.1998.12770eae.008 · Cited by 941
Elementary Magnetic Attitude Control System
Stickler, A. C., & Alfriend, K. T. (1976) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/3.57089 · Cited by 257
Spacecraft attitude control using magnetic actuators
Lovera, M., & Astolfi, A. (2004) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.02.022 · Cited by 241
Global Magnetic Attitude Control of Inertially Pointing Spacecraft
Lovera, M., & Astolfi, A. (2005) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.11844 · Cited by 78
Time-Optimal Detumbling Control of Spacecraft
Aghili, F. (2009) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.43189 · Cited by 41
Detumbling and reorienting underactuated rigid spacecraft
Coverstone-Carroll, V. L. (1996) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/3.21680 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Wertz J., 1978, The Netherlands, 19
- Wie B., 1998, VA, 7
- John S., 1961, NASA TN D-1068
- Flatley T., 1997, Flight Mechanics Symposium, edited by D. M. Walls, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 79
- Fabbri V., 2010, 4th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques [CD-ROM], Madrid, ESA
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey on active magnetic attitude control algorithms for small satellites
Ovchinnikov, M. Y., & Roldugin, D. S. (2019) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.006 · Cited by 107
Magnetic Attitude Control for Satellites in Polar or Sun-Synchronous Orbits
Cubas, J., Farrahi, A., & Pindado, S. (2015) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.g000751 · Cited by 72
Geomagnetic field models for satellite angular motion studies
Ovchinnikov, M. Y., Penkov, V. I., Roldugin, D. S., & Pichuzhkina, A. V. (2017) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.12.026 · Cited by 50
Magnetic satellite detumbling: The b-dot algorithm revisited
Lovera, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171005 · Cited by 48
Carletta, S., Teofilatto, P., & Farissi, M. S. (2020) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace7010003 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Avanzini, G., & Giulietti, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Salento (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Venue
- Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1326-1334
- ISSN
- 0731-5090 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3884
- OpenAlex
- W2060606955
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- AIRUS (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems
- Keywords
- spacecraft attitude control, magnetic actuators, global asymptotic stability, time-dependent magnetic field, controller gain selection, time-optimal control, tumbling spacecraft
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
