Cited by 50Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Background Pressure on SPT-140 Hall Thruster Performance

Snyder, John Steven, Lenguito, Giovanni, Frieman, Jason D., Haag, Thomas W., Mackey, Jonathan A.·2020·Journal of Propulsion and Power

Abstract

The performance of many Hall thrusters has been shown to exhibit sensitivity to background pressure in ground-based test facilities, and this property can have an impact on the prediction of in-space performance. The SPT-140 Hall thruster, similar in design to the SPT-100 thruster, which shows such sensitivity, was subjected to a series of tests to characterize the effects of background pressure on thruster performance over a discharge power range of 0.9–4.5 kW. Thrust sensitivity to pressure, in an absolute sense, was largest at 4.5 kW and decreased with power until there was little-to-no measurable effect at 0.9 kW. In a relative sense, thrust sensitivity was similar at all powers above 0.9 kW with about 2–4% higher thrust measured at than at the lowest operating pressure. Thruster magnetic field sensitivity, examined as a function of magnet current, did not have a strong dependence on facility pressure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/1.b37702

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Oh D. Y., 2017, 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference
  2. 10.2514/6.2014-3606 · DOI
  3. 10.2514/6.2014-3710 · DOI
  4. 10.2514/1.19752 · DOI
  5. 10.2514/6.2016-4826 · DOI
  6. 10.2514/6.2014-3709 · DOI
  7. 10.2514/1.B37133 · DOI
  8. 10.2514/1.48027 · DOI
  9. Chaplin V. H., 2018, Journal of Applied Physics, 124, 10.1063/1.5040388 · DOI
  10. 10.2514/6.2010-8688 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/9780470436448 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jameson-Silva K., 2017, 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference
  13. 10.2514/3.23706 · DOI
  14. 10.2514/1.B35478 · DOI
  15. 10.2514/1.B36269 · DOI
  16. 10.2514/1.B35644 · DOI
  17. 10.2514/1.B35308 · DOI
  18. 10.1063/1.1141998 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.3125626 · DOI
  20. 10.2514/1.B35564 · DOI
  21. 2015, Standard Practice for Ionization Gage Application to Space Simulators, E296-70(2015)
  22. 10.2514/6.2018-4516 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Snyder, J. S., Lenguito, G., Frieman, J. D., Haag, T. W., & Mackey, J. A.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Maxar, Palo Alto, California 94303
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
  • NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Venue
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Published
2020-09
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
668-676
ISSN
  • 0748-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3876
OpenAlex
W3024552435
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Propulsion and Power (publishedVersion)
Funders
NASA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Keywords
Hall thruster, background pressure, discharge pressure, magnetic field sensitivity, electric propulsion, ground testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review