Cited by 4Rocket and propulsion systems researchNuclear reactor physics and engineeringSpacecraft Design and Technology

Combined Cycle Nuclear System Architecture for Crewed Mars Spacecraft Propulsion and Power

Maydan, Jack V., Nabity, James A.·2024·Journal of Propulsion and Power

Abstract

Nuclear thermal propulsion can potentially reduce the time of flight and spacecraft system mass needed for human spaceflight beyond cislunar space. This nuclear propulsion system has comparable thrust capability to chemically impulsive systems, which at about twice the specific impulse, can double the delta-velocity ([Formula: see text]) for the same propellant mass. However, the canonical problem for nuclear propulsion has always been that its benefits are shadowed by low technology readiness of a complex system. This paper describes a combined cycle nuclear thermal rocket (CCNTR) system architecture for propulsion and electrical power that comprises a 42-MWt-capable nuclear reactor core to provide 9.4 kN thrust on demand at a specific impulse of 940 s. The liquid hydrogen propellant flow through the rocket chamber cools the reactor during burns, thereby producing thrust while concurrently rejecting waste heat to space. The reactor also produces up to 100 kWe power for the spacecraft, eliminating the need for solar power generation and averting challenges associated with restarting a cold reactor for propulsive burns. Radiators reject the waste heat from electrical power production. Earth-to-Mars orbital transfers less than 100 days appear feasible assuming 680,000 kg of liquid hydrogen propellant and a vehicle dry mass of 83,000 kg that includes the 13,000 kg CCNTR system. Together, these results suggest that a CCNTR could be most promising to enable crewed missions to Mars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/1.b39149

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Walton J. T., 1991, AIAA/NASA/OAI Conference on Advanced Space Exploration Initiative Technologies
  2. Heacock R., 1980, Institution of Mechanical Engineers James Watt International Gold Medal Lecture, 194
  3. Rowe D. M., 2015, Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano
  4. Larson W. J., 1999, Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design
  5. Larson W. J., 1999, Space Mission Analysis and Design
  6. Foust O. J., 1972, Sodium Na-K Engineering Handbook
  7. Mattingly J. D., 2006, Education Series
  8. CaseD.NabityJ. “Astronaut Radiation Protection for Long Duration Missions: Integrating Passive Radiation Shielding into Space Habitat Design,” Ph.D. Thesis, Aerospace Engineering Dept. Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 2021.
  9. Borowski S. K., 2013, Advanced In-Space Transportation Systems for Exploration

Authors
Maydan, J. V., & Nabity, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Published
2024-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
3-13
ISSN
  • 0748-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3876
OpenAlex
W4387939472
Cited by
4
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Propulsion and Power (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
nuclear thermal propulsion, human Mars missions, spacecraft power generation, nuclear reactor core, specific impulse, spacecraft mass, waste heat rejection, radiators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review