The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
Abstract
A new method for performing a balanced reduction of a high-order linear system is presented. The technique combines the proper orthogonal decomposition and concepts from balanced realization theory. The method of snapshots is used to obtain low-rank, reduced-range approximationsto the system controllability and observability grammiansin either the time or frequency domain.The approximationsare then used to obtain a balanced reducedorder model. The method is particularly effective when a small number of outputs is of interest. It is demonstrated for a linearized high-order system that models unsteady motion of a two-dimensional airfoil. Computation of the exact grammians would be impractical for such a large system. For this problem, very accurate reducedorder models are obtained that capture the required dynamics with just three states. The new models exhibit far superior performance than those derived using a conventionalproper orthogonaldecomposition. Although further development is necessary, the concept also extends to nonlinear systems. W Nomenclature h = airfoil plunge displacement K = proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) kernel m = number of POD snapshots n = number of states in computational � uid dynamics (CFD) model nr = number of states in reduced-ordermodel R = correlation matrix T = matrix whose columns contain the balancing transformation vectors u; U = vector containing inputs for models, time and frequency domain Wc = controllabilitygrammian Wco = grammian product Wo = observability grammian x; X = aerodynamic state vector for CFD model, time and frequency domain xr = aerodynamic state vector for reduced-ordermodel y; Y = vector containing outputs of CFD model, time and frequency domain yr = vector containing outputs of reduced-ordermodel z = dual state vector for CFD model i = ith Hankel singular value = basis vector! = forcing frequency
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
Chaturantabut, S., & Sorensen, D. C. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/090766498 · Cited by 1,925
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity
Amsallem, D., & Farhat, C. (2008) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.35374 · Cited by 710
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
(2018) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Willcox, K., & Peraire, J.
- Venue
- AIAA Journal
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2323-2330
- ISSN
- 0001-1452 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-385X
- OpenAlex
- W2098077093
- Cited by
- 989
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2514/2.1570
- The paper
- Willcox, K., & Peraire, J. (2002). Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. AIAA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.