Cited by 51Structural mechanics and materialsConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchPlanetary Science and Exploration

Strength and Durability Performance of Waterless Lunar Concrete

Toutanji, H, Glenn-Loper, Becca, Schrayshuen, Beth·2005·43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Abstract

The development of permanent lunar bases is constrained by performance of construction materials and availability of in-situ resources. Concrete seems a suitable construction material for the lunar environment, but water, one of its major components, is an extremely scarce resource on the Moon. This study explores an alternative to hydraulic concrete by replacing the binding mix of concrete (cement and water) with sulfur. Sulfur is a volatile element on the lunar surface that can be extracted from lunar soils by heating. Different sulfur concrete mixes were prepared to investigate the effect of extreme environmental conditions on the properties of sulfur concrete. The specimens were divided into 3 groups. The first group was kept at room temperature, the second group was subjected to constant freezing temperature of -27 o C, and the third group was subjected to 50 cycles of freeze/thaw exposure. Results show that the compressive strength of sulfur concrete is much higher than that of hydraulic cement-based concrete. The addition of silica increases the strength significantly; whereas the addition of dicyclopentadiene (DCP) reduces the strength. No significant reduction in strength was reported in any of the sulfur concrete specimens due to freeze-thaw or low temperature exposure. The addition of DCP showed an increase in strength due to a constant freezing condition. The technology constraints on the site selection and the performance of construction material under extreme lunar environments will be also highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2005-1436

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sulfur concrete with 65 wt% JSC-1 simulant and 35 wt% sulfur showed average compressive strengths of 17.5, 15.7, and 17.6 MPa after room temperature, -27°C for 50 days, and 50 freeze/thaw cycles, respectively.

    “Three samples were tested in each set and the average value of the compressive strength of the first, second, and third conditions were 2530, 2283, and 2559 psi (17.5, 15.7, and 17.6 MPa), respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toutanji, H., Glenn-Loper, B., & Schrayshuen, B.
Affiliations
University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Venue
43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
Published
2005-01-10
OpenAlex
W2111274243
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Structural mechanics and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
lunar concrete, sulfur concrete, lunar base, in-situ resource utilization, freeze-thaw resistance, low-temperature performance, compressive strength, silica addition, dicyclopentadiene, lunar regolith, lunar construction materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review