Cited by 55Inertial Sensor and NavigationRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

A General Approach to Terrain Relative Navigation for Planetary Landing

Johnson, Andrew, Ansar, Adnan, Matthies, Larry, Trawny, Nikolas, Mourikis, Anastasios, Roumeliotis, Stergios·2007·AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2007 Conference and Exhibit

Abstract

We describe an algorithm for navigation state estimation during planetary descent to enable precision landing. The algorithm automatically produces 2D-to-3D correspondences between descent images and a surface map and 2D-to-2D correspondences through a sequence of descent images. These correspondences are combined with inertial measurements in an extended Kalman filter that estimates lander position, velocity and attitude as well as the time varying biases of the inertial measurements. The filter tightly couples inertial and camera measurements in a resource-adaptive and hence real-time capable fashion. Results from a sounding rocket test, covering the dynamic profile of typical planetary landing scenarios, show estimation errors of magnitude 0.16 m/s in velocity and 6.4 m in position at touchdown. These results vastly improve current state of the art and meet the requirements of future planetary exploration missions. N I.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2007-2854

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More persistent feature tracking, in which a feature is initially detected and is then repeatedly detected in future frames, improves accuracy of the state estimate in TRN since longer tracks correspond to higher signal to noise ratios.

    “More persistent feature tracking, in which a feature is initially detected and is then repeatedly detected in future frames, improves accuracy of the state estimate in TRN since longer tracks correspond to higher signal to noise ratios [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, A., Ansar, A., Matthies, L., Trawny, N., Mourikis, A., & Roumeliotis, S.
Affiliations
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2007 Conference and Exhibit
Published
2007-05-07
OpenAlex
W2055415212
Cited by
55
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2007 Conference and Exhibit (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
terrain relative navigation, planetary landing, precision landing, extended Kalman filter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review