Cited by 3Space Exploration and TechnologySpace exploration and regulationSpacecraft Design and Technology

Environmental Control and Life Support Integration Strategy for 6 Crew Operations

Open access
Duchesne, Stephanie, Tressler, Chad·2010·40th International Conference on Environmental Systems

Abstract

The International Space Station (ISS) crew complement has increased in size from 3 to 6 crew members. In order to support this increase in crew on ISS, the United States on-orbit Segment (USOS) has been outfitted with a suite of regenerative Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLS) hardware including an Oxygen Generation System (OGS), Waste and Hygiene Compartment (WHC), and a Water Recovery System (WRS). The WRS includes the Urine Processor Assembly (UPA) and the Water Processor Assembly (WPA). With this additional life support hardware, the ISS has achieved full redundancy in its on-orbit life support system between the t OS and Russian Segment (RS). The additional redundancy created by the Regenerative ECLS hardware creates the opportunity for independent support capabilities between segments, and for the first time since the start of ISS, the necessity to revise Life Support strategy agreements. Independent operating strategies coupled with the loss of the Space Shuttle supply and return capabilities in 2010 offer new and unique challenges. This paper will discuss the evolution of the ISS Life Support hardware strategy in support of 6-Crew on ISS, as well as the continued work that is necessary to ensure the support of crew and ISS Program objectives through the life of station

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2010-6181

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duchesne, S., & Tressler, C.
Affiliations
  • Wyle (United States) (US)
  • Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) (US)
Venue
40th International Conference on Environmental Systems
Published
2010-07-11
OpenAlex
W2147087256
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
International Space Station, environmental control and life support systems, regenerative life support, water recovery system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review