The DAN-AERO MW Experiments
Abstract
The paper describes the DAN-AERO MW experiments carried out within a collaborative, three years research project between Riso DTU and the industrial partners LM Glasfiber, Siemens Wind Power, Vestas Wind Systems and finally the utility company DONG Energy. The main objective of the project is to establish an experimental data base which can provide new insight into a number of fundamental aerodynamic and aeroacoustic issues, important for the design and operation of MW size turbines. The most important issue is the difference between airfoil characteristics measured under 2D, steady conditions in a wind tunnel and the unsteady 3D flow conditions on a rotor. The different transition characteristics might explain some of the difference between the 2D and 3D airfoil data and the experiments have been set up to provide data on this subject. The overall experimental approach has been to carry out a number of coordinated, innovative measurements on full scale MW size rotors as well as on airfoils for MW size turbines in wind tunnels. Shear and turbulence inflow characteristics were measured on a Siemens 3.6 MW turbine with a five hole pitot tube. Pressure and turbulent inflow characteristics were measured on a 2MW NM80 turbine with an 80 m rotor. One of the LM38.8 m blades on the rotor was replaced with a new LM38.8 m blade where instruments for surface pressure measurements at four radial sections were build into the blade during the blade production process. Additionally, the out…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acquiring aerodynamic and aeroacoustic data from the blades of a hundreds meters' tall turbine usually implies considerable effort and cost in measurement campaigns.
“In practice, this usually implies considerable effort and cost in measurement campaigns [5], [6].”
From Aerosense: A Self-Sustainable and Long-Range Bluetooth Wireless Sensor Node for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Monitoring on Wind Turbines (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The distance between the base station and the antenna on the blade can change significantly, i.e., by 80 m, depending on the relative position of the blade.
“Indeed, the distance between the base station and the antenna on the blade can change significantly, i.e., by 80 m [6], [8], depending on the relative position of the blade.”
From Aerosense: A Self-Sustainable and Long-Range Bluetooth Wireless Sensor Node for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Monitoring on Wind Turbines (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The LPS27HHW can measure from 260 to 1260 hPa absolute pressure range, which covers the range for wind turbine monitoring.
“It can measure from 260 to 1260 hPa absolute pressure range, which covers the range for wind turbine monitoring [6], [8], [19], [20].”
From Aerosense: A Self-Sustainable and Long-Range Bluetooth Wireless Sensor Node for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Monitoring on Wind Turbines (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
The distance between the base station and the antenna on the blade can change significantly, i.e., by 80 m, depending on the relative position of the blade.
“Indeed, the distance between the base station and the antenna on the blade can change significantly, i.e., by 80 m [6], [8], depending on the relative position of the blade.”
From Aerosense: A Self-Sustainable and Long-Range Bluetooth Wireless Sensor Node for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Monitoring on Wind Turbines (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
The LPS27HHW can measure from 260 to 1260 hPa absolute pressure range, which covers the range for wind turbine monitoring.
“It can measure from 260 to 1260 hPa absolute pressure range, which covers the range for wind turbine monitoring [6], [8], [19], [20].”
From Aerosense: A Self-Sustainable and Long-Range Bluetooth Wireless Sensor Node for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Monitoring on Wind Turbines (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polonelli, T., Muller, H., Kong, W., Fischer, R., Benini, L., & Magno, M. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3224307 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Madsen, H., Fuglsang, P., Romblad, J., Enevoldsen, P., Laursen, J., Jensen, L., Bak, C., Paulsen, U. S., Gaunna, M., & Sorensen, N. N.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- LM Glasfiber A/S
- Vestas (Denmark) (DK)
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- Ørsted (Denmark) (DK)
- Riso DTU
- Venue
- 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
- Published
- 2010-01-04
- OpenAlex
- W2100205316
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
- Keywords
- large wind turbines, airfoil aerodynamics, aeroacoustics, unsteady three-dimensional flow, surface pressure measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review