Cited by 7Planetary Science and ExplorationSpacecraft Design and TechnologyThermal properties of materials

Experimental Characterization of Thermal Wadis in Support of Lunar Exploration

Matyas, J., Wegeng, R., Robinson, M., Casella, A., McCloy, J.·2011·AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of science and exploration systems to survive the lunar night. We have proposed that a thermal mass can be manufactured from lunar regolith by electrical resistance heating. The thermal mass can then store heat during the lunar day and release it slowly throughout the night, providing protection to science and exploration systems from the detrimental effects of cold. When engineering a thermal mass, accurate characterization of how the mass conducts and emits heat is vital. Two regolith stimulants, JSC-1AF and NU-LHT-2M, and Columbia River Basalt BCR-2 were used to study the effect of experimental conditions (T, t, and atmosphere) on sintering and densification and to identify the optimal conditions for manufacturing the thermal mass material. The sintering and densification of small samples was performed in the electrical furnaces at different final temperatures, different cooling rates, under air or vacuum, or in an argon atmosphere. To determine the impact of sample microstructure (size, shape, and concentration of open and closed pores) and crystallinity on the range of thermal diffusivities for sintered/densified materials and to obtain emissivities of densified materials as a function of temperature, the manufactured samples were analyzed with high magnification, X-ray diffraction (XRD), a laser-flash thermal diffusivity (LFTD) system, and the millimeter-wave (MMW) system. The sintered/densified samples were analyzed for thermal diffusivity by the laser flash method in air and under vacuum in the temperature range 27 to 390°C. Thermal diffusivities of densified low-porosity JSC-1AF and BCR-2 samples were about the same in air or under vacuum and ranged from 0.46 to 0.76 mm 2 /s at 27°C. On contrary, thermal diffusivities of high open-porosity and fully crystalline NU-LHT-2M samples were approximately 2 to 3 times smaller under vacuum because of the longer conductive path through the pores boundary layer. The thermal diffusivities of tested samples decreased with temperature and were ≈ 20 to 25% lower at 390°C than at 27°C. The effect of temperature on radiative emissivity was monitored with a millimeter wave radiometer/interferometer during the temperature rise from 25 to 325°C. The emissivities for all the tested materials increased with temperature in the same way and ranged from 0.67 at 25°C to 0.96 at 325°C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2011-7364

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sintering highland simulant (NU-LHT-2M) required 1300°C; at 1200°C it resulted in poorly densified structure with porosity 62.8% to 89.0%.

    “On the contrary, a higher temperature of 1300 ◦ C was needed for sintering highland simulant, as sintering at 1200 ◦ C resulted in a poorly densified structure with the porosity content of 62.8% to 89.0%.”
  • Thermal diffusivity of up to 0.76 mm2/s can be achieved upon sintering regolith, which is more than 100 times higher than regolith powder thermal diffusivity (0.0066 mm2/s).

    “Furthermore, it was shown that thermal diffusivity of up to 0 . 76 mm 2 /s can be achieved upon sintering the regolith, which is more than 100 times higher than the regolith powder thermal diffusivity ( 0 . 0066 mm 2 /s).”
  • Lunar mare simulant (JSC-1AF) was successfully densified and sintered at 1200°C with porosity content between 3.6% and 9.9%, depending on atmosphere and cooling rate.

    “Results showed that the Lunar mare simulant was successfully densified and sintered at 1200 ◦ C with a porosity content between 3.6% and 9.9%, depending on the atmosphere and cooling rate.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matyas, J., Wegeng, R., Robinson, M., Casella, A., & McCloy, J.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Venue
AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition
Published
2011-06-14
OpenAlex
W2107671774
Cited by
7
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA SPACE Conference & Exposition (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Battelle
  • NASA Headquarters
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
Keywords
thermal mass, lunar regolith, electrical resistance heating, sintering, densification, thermal diffusivity, Columbia River basalt, pore structure, cooling rate, argon atmosphere, thermal insulation, crystallinity, porosity, X-ray diffraction, millimeter-wave radiometry, interferometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review