Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for 'Fast Transit' Human Missions to Mars
Open accessAbstract
The "fast conjunction" long surface stay mission option was selected for NASA's recent Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study because it provided adequate time at Mars (approx. 540 days) for the crew to explore the planet's geological diversity while also reducing the "1-way" transit times to and from Mars to approx. 6 months. Short transit times are desirable in order to reduce the debilitating physiological effects on the human body that can result from prolonged exposure to the zero-gravity (0-gE) and radiation environments of space. Recent measurements from the RAD detector attached to the Curiosity rover indicate that astronauts would receive a radiation dose of approx. 0.66 Sv (approx. 66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during their 1-year journey in deep space. Proven nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) technology, with its high thrust and high specific impulse (Isp approx. 900 s), can cut 1-way transit times by as much as 50 percent by increasing the propellant capacity of the Mars transfer vehicle (MTV). No large technology scale-ups in engine size are required for these short transit missions either since the smallest engine tested during the Rover program-the 25 klbf "Pewee" engine is sufficient when used in a clustered arrangement of three to four engines. The "Copernicus" crewed MTV developed for DRA 5.0 is a 0-gE design consisting of three basic components: (1) the NTP stage (NTPS); (2) the crewed payload element; and (3) an integrated "saddle truss" and LH2 propellant drop tank assembly that connects the two elements. With a propellant capacity of approx. 190 t, Copernicus can support 1-way transit times ranging from approx. 150 to 220 days over the 15-year synodic cycle. The paper examines the impact on vehicle design of decreasing transit times for the 2033 mission opportunity. With a fourth "upgraded" SLS/HLV launch, an "in-line" LH2 tank element can be added to Copernicus allowing 1-way transit times of 130 days. To achieve 100 to 120 day transit times, Copernicus' saddle truss/drop tank assembly is replaced by a "star truss" assembly with paired modular drop tanks to further increase the vehicle's propellant capacity. The HLV launch count increases (from approx. 5 to 7) and a fourth engine is needed to reduce total mission burn time and gravity losses. Using a "split mission" approach, the NTPS, in-line tank and the saddle truss/LH2 drop tank elements can be configured as a pre-deployed Earth Return Vehicle/propellant tanker supporting 90-day crewed mission transits. The split mission approach also eliminates the need for on-orbit assembly. Mission scenario descriptions, key features and operational characteristics for five different vehicle configurations are presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Four HLV launches are required to deliver the major Copernicus-3 transportation systems elements (NTPS, in-line tank, and two drop tanks) to LEO.
“Four HLV launches are required to deliver the major transportation systems elements (the NTPS, in-line tank and two drop tanks) to LEO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In Copernicus-2, the masses of the in-line tank element and the saddle truss/drop tank assembly are balanced at about 118.8 t.
“With these equal tank lengths, the masses of in-line tank element and the saddle truss/drop tank assembly are balanced at ~118.8 t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For Copernicus-2, with about 100.4 klbf total thrust and Isp of 906 s, total engine burn time is about 84.2 min.
“With ~100.4 klb f of total thrust and a I sp of 906 s, the total engine burn time for this mission is ~84.2 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the 2033 opportunity, round-trip mission delta-V requirements rise dramatically as transit times are shortened.
“As is evident, the V requirements rise dramatically as the transit times are shortened.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 2033 opportunity, reducing transit times by 60 days from 180 to 120 days increases total mission delta-V by about 46 percent.
“Decreasing the transit times by 60 days-from 180 to 120 days-increases the total mission V by ~46 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
Even with a fourth engine added, Copernicus-2's total engine burn time requirement increases by 13 percent, from 74.6 to 84.2 min.
“Even with a fourth engine added, the total burn time requirement on the engines is increased by 13 percent (from 74.6 to 84.2 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For Copernicus-2, the first TMI perigee burn is the longest single burn at about 35 min.
“The first TMI perigee burn is the longest single burn at ~35 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During the four primary Copernicus-3 mission burns, about 321 t of LH2 propellant is used.
“During the four primary mission burns ~321 t of LH 2 propellant is used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The total crewed payload mass at TMI is about 67.3 t.
“The total crewed payload mass at TMI is ~67.3 t distributed as follows:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In transitioning from 120- to 100-day transit times, total mission delta-V increases by about 42 percent, from about 8.83 to 12.5 km/s.
“In transitioning from 120 to 100-day transit times the total mission V increases by ~42 percentfrom ~8.83 to ~12.5 km/s.”
- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
“Further reductions in transit times from 120 to 100 days requires an ~42 percent increase in total mission Vfrom ~8.83 to ~12.5 km/s.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
- Findingreasoning
For Copernicus-2, the in-line tank and NTPS supply propellant for the remaining MOC (~17.5 min) and TEI (~9.9 min) burns.
“The in-line tank and NTPS supply the propellant for the remaining MOC (~17.5 min) and TEI burns (~9.9 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
As transit times decrease, a slowdown burn on the return leg is needed to keep arrival Vinf at Earth below 6.81 km/s at an altitude of about 125 km.
“As transit times decrease, it becomes necessary to perform a slowdown burn on the return leg to ensure that arrival V inf at Earth is less than 6.81 km/s at an altitude of ~125 km.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the 2033 opportunity, a further 60-day reduction in transit time to 90 days each way increases total mission delta-V by about 250 percent.
“A further 60-day reduction in transit time-down to 90 days each wayincreases the total mission V by ~250 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Copernicus was sized to perform all fast conjunction Mars missions in the 2033 to 2048 timeframe.
“Copernicus was sized so it can perform all fast conjunction missions in the 2033 to 2048 timeframe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For 90-day transits, the mission ΔV budget rises by about 250 percent to about 15.175 km/s.
“The mission V budget however, increases by ~250 percent to ~15.175 km/s!”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
To satisfy the high-energy requirements of the 100-day mission, Copernicus-3a adds a second set of drop tanks to the star truss.
“To satisfy the high-energy requirements of this mission, Copernicus-3a (shown in Figs. 8 and 12) adds a second set of drop tanks to the star truss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 2033 mission opportunity, with propellant tanks near their maximum capacity of about 190 t, Copernicus can achieve 150-day one-way transit times.
“For the 2033 mission opportunity, with its propellant tanks near their maximum capacity of ~190 t, Copernicus can achieve 150-day transit times.”
- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
“For the 2033 mission opportunity baselined in this paper, Copernicus can achieve 1-way transit times of ~150 days when filled to its maximum propellant capacity of ~190 t.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
- Findingnone given
The engine operational requirements for the 100-day case exceed those demonstrated in the NERVA program.
“The engine operational requirements for the 100-day case also exceed those demonstrated in the NERVA program.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For 120-day transits to Mars and back, twin drop tanks each carrying about 80 t of propellant are used.
“For 120day transits to Mars and back, twin drop tanks-each carrying ~80 t of propellant-are used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For the ERV, the first TMI perigee burn is the longest at about 41.3 min.
“The first TMI perigee burn is the longest at ~41.3 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
To reduce 1-way transit times from 150 to 130 days, an in-line tank inserted between Copernicus' NTPS and saddle truss/drop tank assembly increases the vehicle's propellant capacity by about 42 percent to about 270 t.
“To reduce the 1-way transit times from 150 to 130 days, an in-line tank is inserted between Copernicus' NTPS and saddle truss/drop tank assembly that increases the vehicle' propellant capacity by ~42 percent to ~270 t.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the outbound Copernicus-2, the first TMI perigee burn is the longest at about 52.6 min.
“The first TMI perigee burn is the longest at ~52.6 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Copernicus-3a's total engine burn time exceeds the ~2 hr demonstrated on the NRX-XE engine by about 45 min.
“This value exceeds the ~2 hr demonstrated on the NRX-XE engine by ~45 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The total mission IMLEO for the two spacecraft in the split mission is about 762.4 t.
“Lastly, the total mission IMLEO for the two spacecraft is ~762.4t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis presented in the paper indicates that transit time reductions as much as 50 percent are possible.
“The answer to the first question is yes, and analysis presented here indicates transit time reductions as much as 50 percent are possible.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Proven nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) technology, with its high thrust and high specific impulse (I sp ~900 s), can cut 1-way transit times by as much as 50 percent by increasing the propellant capacity of the Mars transfer vehicle (MTV).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
- Findingreasoning
For Copernicus-3a, with 100.4 klbf thrust and Isp about 940 s, total engine burn time is about 165.4 min.
“With 100.4 klb f of thrust and I sp ~940 s, the total engine burn time is ~165.4min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For the outbound Copernicus-2, the NTPS supplies all propellant needed for MOC (~28.2 min).
“The NTPS supplies all the propellant needed for MOC (~28.2 min).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
With a propellant capacity of about 190 t, Copernicus can support 1-way transit times ranging from about 150 to 220 days over the 15-year synodic cycle.
“With a propellant capacity of ~190 t, Copernicus can support 1-way transit times ranging from ~150 to 220 days over the 15-year synodic cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the ERV, with about 244.3 t of usable propellant and Isp of 940 s, total engine burn time is about 112.1 min.
“With ~244.3 t of usable propellant and a I sp of ~940 s, the total engine burn time for this mission is ~112.1 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For Copernicus-3a, the operating temperature of the engines' UC-ZrC graphite composite fuel is increased to achieve a specific impulse of about 940 s.
“Lastly, the operating temperature of the engines' (UC-ZrC) graphite composite fuel is increased to achieve a specific impulse of ~940 s (see Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For the outbound Copernicus-2, with about 75.3 klbf total thrust, Isp of 940 s, and about 239 t of usable propellant, total engine burn time is about 109.6 min.
“With ~75.3 klb f of total thrust, an I sp of 940 s, and ~239 t of usable propellant, the total engine burn time for this mission is ~109.6 min.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Rover/NERVA tests demonstrated restart capability of more than 2 hours with 28 startup and shutdown cycles, achieved in NRX-XE.
“(5) restart capability (>2 hr with 28 startup and shutdown cycles achieved in the NRX-XE experimental engine)-all the requirements needed for short transit time Mars missions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
At the end of Rover/NERVA, composite fuel performance was projected at about 2 to 6 hours at full power for hydrogen exhaust temperatures of about 2500 to 2800 K.
“At the end of Rover/NERVA program, composite fuel performance projections (Ref.15) were estimated at ~2 to 6 hr at full power for hydrogen exhaust temperatures of ~2500 to 2800 K.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.15
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
NTP does not require the large increases in engine size or performance that other non-chemical propulsion options require.
“This means there are no large scale-ups in size or performance needed for NTP as there are with other proposed non-chemical propulsion options.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Operating LANTR engines at a LOX-to-LH2 mixture ratio of 1 during the first TMI perigee burn increases thrust by over 62 percent, from 25 to about 40.6 klbf.
“By operating the LANTR engines with a LOX-to-LH 2 mixture ratio (MR) = 1 during the first TMI perigee burn, the engine's thrust level can be increased by over 62 percent-from 25 to ~40.6 klb f .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Refs.20 and 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The Rover/NERVA programs from 1955 to 1972 reached technology readiness levels of about 5 and 6.
“During the Rover/NERVA programs (1955 to 1972), a technology readiness level (TRL ~5 and 6) was achieved (Ref.8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Higher specific impulse can be achieved by raising the fuel operating temperature.
“With T ex ~2790 K and NAR~300:1, the I sp is ~906 s with higher I sp values achievable by increasing the fuel operating temperature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The RAD detector on the Mars Science Laboratory measured an average dose rate of about 1.8×10^-3 Sv per day during its 253-day journey to Mars.
“The detector measured an average of ~1.8×10 -3 Sv per day indicating that astronauts could receive a radiation dose of ~0.66 Sv (~66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during a fast conjunction Mars mission involving a 1-year journey through deep space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
For the higher-energy short-stay opposition missions studied in Phase I, NTP saved more than 530 t compared with chemical propulsion.
“For the higher energy, short stay opposition missions examined during Phase I, NTP provided an even greater mass savings-over 530 t compared to chemical propulsion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref. 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Copernicus, carrying about 190 t of propellant in two tanks, can achieve one-way Mars transit times of about 150 to 220 days over a 15-year synodic cycle beginning in 2033.
“With a propellant capacity of ~190 t in its two tanks, Copernicus can achieve 1-way transit times to Mars and back ranging from ~150 to 220 days over a 15-year synodic cycle starting in 2033.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Refs.9 and 10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Transit times as short as 90 days are possible using NTP.
“While challenging, transit times this short are possible using NTP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The fast conjunction 2033 opportunity was chosen as the baseline because missions in 2033-2035 have ΔV budgets near their minimum over the 15-year synodic cycle.
“The fast conjunction 2033 opportunity was selected as the baseline mission for this analysis since missions performed in the 2033 to 2035 timeframe have V budgets near their minimum values over the 15-year synodic cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Achieving transit times below 150 days requires modifying Copernicus to carry additional propellant.
“To achieve transit times less than 150 days, it is necessary to modify the Copernicus spacecraft so it can carry additional propellant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A cluster of three to four Pewee-class engines is more than adequate for the NTP Mars missions considered.
“A cluster of three to four Pewee-class engines are more than adequate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Rover/NERVA tests demonstrated sustained engine operation for over 62 minutes in a single burn, achieved in NRX-A6.
“(3) sustained engine operation (over 62 min for a single burn achieved in the NRX-A6);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The mission's total engine burn time is well below the about 2-hour accumulated burn time and 27 restarts demonstrated by NRX-XE.
“well under the ~2 hr accumulated engine burn time and 27 restarts demonstrated by the NERVA eXperimental Engine-the NRX-XE (Ref.8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Rover/NERVA integrated tests demonstrated thrust levels of about 25, 50, 75, and 250 klbf.
“(1) a wide range of thrust levels (~25, 50, 75, and 250 klb f );”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Using NTP lowered the launch mass needed for the baseline long-stay Mars mission by more than 400 t relative to chemical propulsion.
“the use of NTP reduced the required launch mass for the baseline long stay mission by over 400 t-the equivalent mass of the International Space Station.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref. 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Rover/NERVA tests demonstrated carbide-based nuclear fuels that produced hydrogen exhaust temperatures up to 2550 K, achieved in Pewee.
“(2) high temperature carbide-based nuclear fuels that provided hydrogen exhaust temperatures up to 2550 K (achieved in Pewee);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Composite fuel showed better corrosion resistance than the standard coated-particle graphite-matrix fuel used in earlier Rover/NERVA reactor tests.
“They also demonstrated better corrosion resistance than the standard coated particle graphite matrix fuel element used in the previous Rover/NERVA reactor tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Twenty rocket reactors were designed, built, and ground tested in integrated reactor/engine tests during Rover/NERVA.
“Twenty rocket reactors were designed, built and ground tested in integrated reactor/engine tests that demonstrated:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
By using two separate vehicles for the crewed mission, three engines are again sufficient for each.
“By using two separate vehicles for the crewed mission, three engines are again sufficient for each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Recent measurements of the energetic particle radiation environment inside the MSL spacecraft during its journey to Mars indicate that astronauts could receive a radiation dose of about 0.66 Sv (~66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during a 1-year journey out to Mars and back.
“Recent measurements of the energetic particle radiation environment inside MSL spacecraft during it journey out to Mars indicate that astronauts could receive a radiation dose of ~0.66 Sv (~66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during a 1-year journey out to Mars and back.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“Recent measurements from the RAD detector attached to the Curiosity rover indicate that astronauts would receive a radiation dose of ~0.66 Sv (~66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during their 1-year journey in deep space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
- Premisecitation
In NASA's DRA 5.0 study, the fast conjunction long surface stay mission was identified as the preferred approach for exploring Mars.
“In NASA's recent DRA 5.0 study (NASA/SP-2009-566), the fast conjunction long surface stay mission was identified as the preferred approach for exploring Mars.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NASA/SP-2009-566
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 36
- May combine two claims. 60
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFor the longer in-line tank, the cryocooler system requires about 9.13 kWe of electrical power supplied by PVAs on the NTPS and in-line tank.
“For the longer in-line tank, the cryocooler system requires ~9.13 kW e of electrical power supplied by PVAs on the NTPS and in-line tank.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 130-day Copernicus-2 mission uses four primary burns with three restarts and about 253.8 t of LH2 propellant.
“For this 130-day transit mission, there are four primary burns (with three restarts) and ~253.8 t of LH 2 propellant is used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Copernicus crewed MTV is about 93.7 m long and has an IMLEO of about 331.7 t for the 150-day transit 2033 mission.
“The Copernicus crewed MTV has an overall length of ~93.7 m (Fig. 7) and an IMLEO of ~331.7 t for the 150-day transit 2033 mission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCopernicus-2 requires one additional HLV launch and development of an in-line tank element with its own ZBO cryocooler system.
“Copernicus-2 also requires one additional HLV launch as well as the development of the in-line tank element with its own ZBO cryocooler system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe round-trip mission has four primary burns with three restarts and uses about 168.7 t of LH2 propellant.
“For the round trip mission, there are four primary burns (three restarts) that use ~168.7 t of LH 2 propellant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3, each drop tank is about 18.2 m long and the overall vehicle length is about 118.2 m including the 8.9 m Orion MPCV.
“Each drop tank is ~18.2 m long.The overall vehicle length is ~118.2m including the 8.9 m Orion MPCV.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAdding a fourth engine to the NTPS for Copernicus-2 reduces total engine operating time and minimizes g-losses (~326 m/s) during TMI, but increases NTPS inert mass at the expense of LH2 and RCS propellant loading.
“A fourth engine is added to the NTPS to reduce the total engine operating time and minimize g-losses (~326 m/s) during the TMI maneuver but this increases NTPS inert mass at the expense of LH 2 and RCS propellant loading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningIn Copernicus-3, the saddle truss/drop tank assembly is replaced by a 4-sided star truss with twin LH2 drop tanks that supplement propellant carried by the NTPS and in-line tank.
“To achieve transit times in the range of 120 to 100 days, Copernicus' saddle truss/drop tank assembly is replaced by a 4-sided star truss to which paired sets of LH 2 drop tanks are attached as needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Copernicus-2, the in-line and drop tanks are each about 20.5 m long and each carries about 91.5 t of LH2 propellant.
“The in-line and drop tank lengths are the same at ~20.5 m and each tank carries ~91.5 t of LH 2 propellant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor 180-day transits to and from Mars and a 575-day surface stay, the total round-trip time is 935 days and the total ΔV budget excluding gravity losses is 6.045 km/s.
“For 180-day transits to and from Mars and a 575-day stay time at Mars, the total round trip time and V budget (minus g-loss) for the mission are 935 days and 6.045 km/s, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor Copernicus-3, two drop tanks (~190 t) carrying about 159.4 t of LH2 (~79.7 t per tank) are delivered to LEO on two HLV launches and attached to a ~25.4 m star truss (~20.3 t) during LEO assembly.
“Two drop tanks (~190 t) carrying ~159.4 t of LH 2 (~79.7 t per tank) are delivered to LEO on two HLV launches, then attached to the ~25.4 m long star truss (~20.3 t) during the LEO assembly phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe LH2 drop tank is about 22.7 m long, has a mass of about 21 t, a propellant capacity of about 102.4 t, and is off-loaded to carry about 91.9 t.
“The ~22.7 m long LH 2 drop tank has a mass of ~21 t and a propellant capacity of ~102.4 t but is also off-loaded and only carries ~91.9 t of LH 2 propellant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe NTPS LH2 tank has a propellant capacity of about 87.2 t but is off-loaded to carry about 86.8 t for this mission.
“The LH 2 tank has a propellant capacity of ~87.2 t but is slightly off-loaded for this particular mission and carries ~86.8 t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFour rectangular PVAs of 12.5 kWe and 125 m2 provide about 50 kWe at Mars for crew life support, ZBO Brayton cryocooler operation, and high-data-rate communications with Earth.
“Four 12.5 kW e / 125 m 2 rectangular PVAs provide ~50 kW e of electrical power at Mars for crew life-support (~30 kW e ), a ZBO Brayton cryocooler system (~10 kW e ), and high data-rate communications (~10 kW e ) with Earth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3, with 100.4 klbf total thrust and Isp about 906 s, total engine burn time is about 106.4 min, close to the ~2 hr demonstrated on the NRX-XE engine.
“With 100.4 klb f of total thrust and I sp ~906 s, the total engine burn time for this mission is ~106.4min, close to the ~2 hr demonstrated on the NRX-XE engine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenRemoving about 78 W of heat penetrating the 60-layer MLI in LEO requires the two-stage cryocooler to use about 8.9 kWe.
“To remove ~78 W of heat penetrating the 60 layer MLI system in LEO (where the highest tank heat flux occurs), the 2-stage cryocooler system requires ~8.9 kW e for its operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningFor Copernicus-2, after the first TMI perigee burn the drop tank is drained and jettisoned to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the second perigee burn (~21.8 min).
“After this burn, the drop tank is drained and then jettisoned to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the second perigee burn (~21.8 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAn upgraded SLS is used to deliver the crewed payload element and the large but lightweight star truss.
“An upgraded SLS is used to deliver the crewed payload element and the large but lightweight star truss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe saddle truss is about 27.7 m long and has a mass of about 9 t.
“It is ~27.7 m long and has a mass of ~9 t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3, LH2 loading in the off-loaded NTPS, in-line tank, and twin drop tanks is about 83.1, 98.6, and 159.4 t, respectively.
“The LH 2 loading in the off-loaded NTPS, in-line and twin drop tanks is ~83.1, ~98.6, and ~159.4 t, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3, after a long first perigee burn (~52 min), both drop tanks are jettisoned; remaining burn durations are second perigee (~20.7 min), MOC (~22.2 min), and TEI (~11.5 min).
“After completing a long first perigee burn (~52 min), both drop tanks are jettisoned.The remaining burn durations are as follows: second perigee burn (~20.7 min), MOC (~22.2 min) and TEI (~11.5 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor Copernicus-3a, the crew size is reduced to four and the mass of TransHab and consumables is reduced accordingly.
“The crew size is reduced to four and the mass of the TransHab and consumables needed for the mission are reduced accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-2, the NTPS LH2 tank is about 19.7 m long and carries about 86.1 t of propellant, near its maximum capacity of about 87.2 t.
“The LH 2 tank length in the NTPS is ~19.7 m and it carries ~86.1 t of propellant (close to its maximum capacity of ~87.2 t).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningReducing transit times to 90 days increases the Mars stay time to about 673 days and reduces the round-trip time to about 853 days.
“Cutting the transit times in half to 90-days increases the Mars stay time to ~673 days, but decreases the round trip time to ~853 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the 150-day 2033 mission, Copernicus IMLEO includes about 138.8 t for the NTPS, about 125.6 t for the saddle truss and LH2 drop tank, and about 67.3 t for the crew payload section.
“Included are (1) the NTPS (~138.8t); (2) the saddle truss and LH 2 drop tank (~125.6 t); and (3) the crew payload section (~67.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3, the NTPS and in-line LH2 tanks are about 19.7 and 21.9 m long.
“The lengths of NTPS and in-line LH 2 tanks are ~19.7 and ~21.9 m.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenWith an exhaust temperature of about 2790 K and a nozzle area ratio of about 300:1, the NTR specific impulse is about 906 s.
“With T ex ~2790 K and NAR~300:1, the I sp is ~906 s with higher I sp values achievable by increasing the fuel operating temperature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the split mission, the outbound transit time on Copernicus-2 is 100 days and the inbound transit time using the ERV is 90 days.
“The outbound transit time on Copernicus-2 is 100 days and the inbound transit time using the ERV is 90 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOn final approach to Earth, the ERV does a final slowdown burn (delta-V ~2.257 km/s), after which the crew separates and re-enters using the Orion MPCV capsule.
“On the final approach to Earth, the ERV does a final slowdown burn (V ~2.257 km/s) after which the crew separates and re-enters using the Orion MPCV capsule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor Copernicus-3a, the drop tanks are jettisoned in pairs after the first and second perigee burns to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the TMI maneuver.
“The drop tanks are jettisoned in pairs after the first and second perigee burns to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the TMI maneuver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenCopernicus-3a is a large complex vehicle that requires eight launches to deliver its elements to LEO.
“Copernicus-3a is a large complex vehicle that requires eight launches to deliver the various elements to LEO.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningFor the outbound Copernicus-2, after the first TMI perigee burn the drop tank is drained and jettisoned to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the second perigee burn (~28.8 min).
“After this burn, the drop tank is drained and jettisoned to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption during the second perigee burn (~28.8 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe ERV performs the TEI burn on July 1, 2035 and begins the 90-day transfer back to Earth.
“The ERV then performs the TEI burn on July 1, 2035 and begins the 90-day transfer back to Earth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Copernicus-3a payload element includes the Orion MPCV (~15.1 t), which carries additional propellant (~5.1 t) for the final Earth slowdown burn (delta-V ~1.266 km/s) before re-entry while the MTV flies past Earth and is disposed of in heliocentric space.
“The PL element includes the Orion MPCV (~15.1 t) which carries additional propellant (~5.1 t) for the final Earth slowdown burn (V ~1.266 km/s) before re-entry while the MTV flies past Earth and is disposed of in heliocentric space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCopernicus-3a uses composite LH2 tanks instead of Al/Li.
“Composite LH 2 tanks are also used instead of Al/Li.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenSeven HLV launches are required to deliver the major Copernicus-3a transportation systems elements (NTPS, in-line tank, four drop tanks, and PL element) to LEO.
“Seven HLV launches are required to deliver the major transportation systems elements (the NTPS, in-line tank, four drop tanks, and PL element) to LEO.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenCopernicus-3a's overall vehicle length is about 117.6 m.
“The overall vehicle length is ~117.6 m.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCopernicus-3a's four drop tanks carry about 327.8 t of propellant (~82 t per tank), and each tank is about 18.6 m long.
“Copernicus-3a's four drop tanks carry ~327.8 t of propellant (~82 t per tank), and each tank is ~18.6 m long.”
- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
“Four drop tanks-each carrying ~82 t of propellant-are also used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ERV arrives at Mars and propulsively captures into a 24-hr elliptical Mars orbit (~250 by 33,793 km) in October 2031, where it remains until the crewed Copernicus-2 MTV arrives during the next opportunity about 26 months later.
“The ERV then arrives at Mars (arrival V inf ~3.480 km/s) and propulsively captures into a 24-hr elliptical Mars orbit (~250 by 33,793 km, V MOC ~1.34 km/s) in October 2031 where it remains until the crewed Copernicus-2 MTV arrives during the next opportunity ~26 months later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenBefore leaving Mars orbit, the crew jettisons the exterior consumables container and connecting tunnel from the PL element to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption.
“Before leaving Mars orbit, the crew finally jettisons the exterior consumables container and connecting tunnel from the PL element to reduce vehicle mass and propellant consumption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCopernicus-3a's first perigee burn is the longest single burn at about 78.3 min and exceeds the single burn duration record of about 62 min set by the NRX-A6 engine.
“The first perigee burn is the longest single burn at ~78.3 min and also exceeds the single burn duration record of ~62 min set by the NRX-A6 engine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3a, remaining burn durations are second perigee (~37.3 min), MOC (~33.3 min), and TEI (~16.5 min).
“The duration of the remaining burns are as follows: second perigee burn (~37.3 min), MOC (~33.3 min), and TEI (~16.5 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe ERV flies past Earth at a sufficiently high altitude and is disposed of into heliocentric space.
“The ERV flies past Earth at a sufficiently high altitude and is disposed of into heliocentric space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCopernicus-2 departs LEO with its four crew on May 25, 2033 and arrives at Mars 100 days later.
“Copernicus-2 departs LEO with its four crew on May 25, 2033 and arrives at Mars 100 days later.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningUsing Copernicus-2 plus an ERV, a 2033 landing mission would require a round trip time of about 857 days, with about 667 days spent in Mars orbit and on the surface.
“Using the Copernicus-2 spacecraft plus an ERV, a 2033 landing mission would require a round trip time of ~857 days with ~667 days spent in Mars orbit and on the surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenA single SLS with sufficient PL volume will be used to launch the large but lightweight star truss for Copernicus-3a.
“A single SLS with sufficient PL volume will be used to launch the large but lightweight star truss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCopernicus-3a has an IMLEO of about 720.7 t, including NTPS (~137.6 t), in-line tank (~123.7 t), star truss with four common LH2 drop tanks (~397.5 t), and crew payload section (~61.9 t).
“The resulting vehicle has an IMLEO of ~720.7 t, which includes the NTPS (~137.6 t), the in-line tank (~123.7 t), the star truss with four common LH 2 drop tanks (~397.5 t) and the crew PL section (~61.9 t).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn the process, Copernicus-2 uses up about 97 percent of its available propellant.
“In the process, Copernicus-2 uses up ~97 percent of its available propellant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe total and longest single engine burn times required for the ERV mission, while substantial, are still below the capabilities demonstrated by the NRX-XE (~2 hr) and NRX-A6 engines (~62 min).
“The total and longest single engine burn times required for the ERV mission while substantial, are still below the capabilities demonstrated by the NRX-XE (~2 hr) and NRX-A6 engines (~62 min).”
- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · boosted
“Finally, it is important to note that both the total and longest single engine burn times required for the split mission, while substantial, are still below the capabilities demonstrated by the NRX-XE (~2 hr) and NRX-A6 engines (~62 min).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 6.0 Summary and Conclusions · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe ERV's NTPS performs five primary burns (and four restarts) and its three engines provide about 75.3 klbf total thrust.
“The ERV's NTPS performs five primary burns (and four restarts) and its three engines provide ~75.3 klb f of total thrust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningFrom the initial launch of the NTPS until the last drop tank is attached to the star truss via orbital assembly could take about 7 months, assuming 30 days between SLS/HLV launches.
“From the initial launch of the NTPS until the last drop tank is attached to the star truss (via orbital assembly) could take ~7 months assuming 30 days between SLS/HLV launches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For the Copernicus-3a orbital assembly timeline, there are 30 days between SLS/HLV launches.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAfter about 653 days on the surface, the crew lifts off using the MAV and returns to the ERV.
“After ~653 days on the surface, the crew lifts off using the MAV and returns to the ERV.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe HLV launch count increases from about 5 to 7 and a fourth engine is needed to reduce total mission burn time and gravity losses.
“The HLV launch count increases (from ~5 to 7) and a fourth engine is needed to reduce total mission burn time and gravity losses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningNo on-orbit assembly (e.g., attachment of multiple drop tanks) is required for the split mission, only autonomous R&D of several vehicle components.
“No on-orbit assembly (e.g., attachment of multiple drop tanks) is required just autonomous R&D of several vehicle components.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“The split mission approach also eliminates the need for on-orbit assembly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenCopernicus-2 captures into the same parking orbit as the ERV on September 2, 2033.
“It then captures into the same parking orbit as the ERV on September 2, 2033.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe NTPS, in-line, and drop tank elements of the outbound Copernicus-2 (using composite tanks) carry about 87.2, 71.3, and 95 t of LH2, respectively, for a total LH2 propellant loading of about 253.5 t.
“The NTPS, in-line and drop tank elements (again using composite tanks) carry ~87.2, ~71.3, and ~95 t respectively, for a total LH 2 propellant loading of ~253.5 t.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Copernicus-3a, the NTPS and in-line LH2 tanks are about 19.7 and 21.9 m long and carry about 87.2 and 95.5 t of propellant, respectively.
“The LH 2 tank lengths in the NTPS and in-line element are ~19.7 and ~21.9 m, and they carry ~87.2 and ~95.5 t of propellant, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the ERV, remaining burn durations are second perigee (~13.7 min), MOC (~13 min), TEI (~28.6 min), and final slowdown burn (~15.5 min).
“The durations of the remaining burns are as follows: second perigee burn (~13.7 min), MOC (~13 min), TEI (~28.6 min), and final slowdown burn (~15.5 min).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe total usable propellant for the Copernicus-3a mission is about 480.7 t.
“The total usable propellant for the mission is ~480.7 t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe composite tanks used in the ERV's NTPS, in-line, and drop tank elements carry about 87.2, 77, and 95 t of propellant, respectively, for a total propellant loading of about 259.2 t.
“The composite tanks used in the ERV's NTPS, in-line and drop tank elements carry ~87.2, ~77, and ~95 t respectively, for a total propellant loading of ~259.2 t.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTo return to Earth, Copernicus-2 rendezvous with the ERV and the forward crewed PL element is switched over to the ERV; no propellant transfer is required, only a R&D maneuver.
“To return to Earth, Copernicus-2 rendezvous with the ERV and the forward crewed PL element is switched over to the ERV (shown in Fig. 13).No propellant transfer is required just a R&D maneuver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDRA 5.0 selected the fast conjunction/long stay Mars mission option as its baseline because it has lower total ΔV, a long surface stay, short transit times, and no Venus swing-by.
“Because of its attractive features-lower total V, a long surface stay, short transit times, and no VSB-the fast conjunction/long stay mission option was selected as the baseline for DRA 5.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref. 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNTP is a proven technology that was ground tested at the performance levels needed for a human Mars mission.
“NTP is a proven technology successfully ground tested at the performance levels required for a human mission to Mars.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe propellant tank heat load is largest in LEO, and it determines the size of the ZBO cryocooler system.
“The propellant tank heat load is largest in LEO and sizes the ZBO cryocooler system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdding oxygen in LANTR lowers Isp to about 725 s, still about 270 s higher than LOX/LH2 engines.
“The addition of oxygen lowers the I sp to ~725 s but this is still ~270 s higher than that achieved by LOX/LH 2 engines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Refs.20 and 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA fast conjunction Mars mission with a one-year deep-space journey could deliver about 0.66 Sv to astronauts, which is NASA's limiting dose.
“indicating that astronauts could receive a radiation dose of ~0.66 Sv (~66 rem)-the limiting value established by NASA-during a fast conjunction Mars mission involving a 1-year journey through deep space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPewee set records for the highest average fuel-element exit gas temperature, about 2550 K, and the highest peak fuel temperature, about 2750 K.
“It set several performance records including the highest average fuel element exit gas temperature of ~2550 K, and the highest peak fuel temperature ~2750 K.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause solar radiation at Mars is about 486 W/m2, solar array areas can become quite large, about 10 m2/kWe, requiring multiple arrays for human Mars missions.
“Because of the decreased solar radiation at Mars (~486 W/m 2 ), array areas can become quite large (~10 m 2 /kW e ) necessitating multiple arrays for human Mars missions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPewee achieved average and peak reactor-core power densities of about 2340 MWt/m3 and 5200 MWt/m3, respectively.
“Other performance records included average and peak power densities in the reactor core of ~2340 MW t /m 3 and ~5200 MW t /m 3 , respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNo integrated reactor/engine tests were done for cermet fuel, but many specimens were produced and tested in non-nuclear hot hydrogen and irradiation tests with promising results.
“While no integrated reactor/engine tests were conducted, a large number of fuel specimens were produced and exposed to non-nuclear hot H 2 and irradiation testing with promising results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Refs.16 and 17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe baseline Copernicus design can achieve one-way transit times of about 150 to 220 days depending on the opportunity, and 150-day transit times are possible for the 2033 mission.
“The baseline Copernicus design is capable of 1-way transit times ranging from ~150 to 220 days depending on the particular opportunity.For the 2033 mission, 150-day transit times are possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe optimum tank diameter and mass for a Mars NTPS are 10 m and about 140 t.
“The optimum tank diameter and mass for a Mars NTPS are 10 m and ~140 t (Ref.9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPlenty of time for scientific investigation and study, coupled with short ~6-month transit times to reduce crew exposure to 0-g and radiation environments, were key reasons for selecting the fast conjunction long surface stay mission.
“Plenty of time for scientific investigation and study, coupled with short ~6-month transit times to reduce crew exposure to the 0-g E and radiation environments of space were key reasons for this selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe key requirements for further transit time reductions are more propellant and reduced U-235 loading in the engine's reactor fuel elements to allow higher operating temperatures.
“The key requirements are more propellant and reduced U-235 loading in the engine's reactor fuel elements to allow higher operating temperatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUse of a pre-deployed ERV is not a new idea; in NASA's DRM 1.0 study in 1993, the ERV was one of the key transportation system elements used in the mission architecture.
“Use of a pre-deployed ERV is not a new idea.In NASA's DRM 1.0 study in 1993 (Ref.22), the ERV was one of the key transportation system elements used in the mission architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ref.22
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe long TEI burn for the ERV is attributed to the addition of Copernicus-2's ~40.2 t crewed PL mass plus the high TEI delta-V requirement (~3.075 km/s) for the 90-day transit back to Earth.
“The long TEI burn is attributed to the addition of Copernicus-2's ~40.2 t crewed PL mass plus the high TEI V requirement (~3.075 km/s) for the 90-day transit back to Earth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNTP was identified as the preferred propulsion option because of its high performance (100 percent higher Isp than LOX/LH2 chemical propulsion), its demonstrated technology record, and strong synergy with chemical propulsion systems and stages.
“Similarly, NTP was identified as the preferred propulsion option because of its high performance (100 percent higher I sp than LOX/LH 2 chemical propulsion), its demonstrated technology record, plus the strong synergy that exists between it and chemical propulsion systems and stages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFailure to deliver the elements on time and in the prescribed order could delay vehicle assembly and jeopardize mission departure within the specified launch window.
“Failure to deliver the elements on time and in the prescribed order could delay vehicle assembly and jeopardize mission departure within the specified launch window.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The scientific community overwhelmingly preferred Mars missions that visit different sites and stay as long as possible to sample geological diversity and maximize scientific return.
“The scientific community overwhelmingly preferred going to different sites and staying as long as possible so the crew could sample the planet's rich geological diversity and maximize the scientific return on each mission.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the Copernicus-3a orbital assembly timeline, there are 30 days between SLS/HLV launches.
“assuming 30 days between SLS/HLV launches”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prolonged exposure to zero-gravity and radiation environments in space causes debilitating physiological effects on the human body.
“Short transit times are desirable in order to reduce the debilitating physiological effects on the human body that can result from prolonged exposure to the zero-gravity (0-gE) and radiation environments of space.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The second transit-time reduction is 30 days, not 60
MinorAfter the stated reduction to 120 days, reaching 90 days requires a further reduction of 30 days.
Reported 60 · recomputed 30
“Decreasing the transit times by 60 days-from 180 to 120 days-increases the total mission V by ~46 percent.A further 60-day reduction in transit time-down to 90 days each wayincreases the total mission V by ~250 percent.”
Cites
Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory
Zeitlin, C., Hassler, D. M., Cucinotta, F. A., Ehresmann, B., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Brinza, D. E., Kang, S., Weigle, G., Böttcher, S., Böhm, E., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235989 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0
Drake, B. G., Hoffman, S. J., & Beaty, D. W. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero.2010.5446736 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Binns, J., Dicarlo, B. J., Insley, A. J. A., et al. (1957) · Chemical & Engineering News · doi:10.1021/cen-v035n014b.p009 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Review of fuel element development for nuclear rocket engines
Taub, J. M. (1975) · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Nuclear thermal rocket/vehicle design options for future NASA missions to the moon and Mars
Borowski, S. K., Corban, R. R., McGuire, M. L., et al. (1993) · Space Programs and Technologies Conference · doi:10.2514/6.1993-4170 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationBorowski, S. K., Dudzinski, L., & McGuire, M. L. (1998) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1998-3883 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citation"7-Launch" NTR Space Transportation Option for NASA's Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0
Borowski, S. K., McCurdy, D. R., & Packard, T. (2009) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2009-5308 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationBorowski, S. K., Dudzinski, L., & McGuire, M. L. (1999) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1999-2545 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationA 25,000-lbf Thrust Engine Options Based on the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine Design
Schnitzler, B. G., Borowski, S. K., & Fittje, J. E. (2009) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2009-5239 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationBorowski, S. K., McCurdy, D. R., & Packard, T. (2012) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationNational space policy of the United States.
Obama, B. (2010) · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Borowski, S. K. (2012) · AIAA SPACE Conference & Exposition · doi:10.2514/6.2012-5144 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationLower Thrust Engine Options Based on the Small Nuclear Rocket Engine Design
Schnitzler, B. G., Borowski, S. K., & Fittje, J. E. (2011) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2011-5846 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationSmall Reactor Designs Suitable for Direct Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Interim Report
Schnitzler, B. (2012) · doi:10.2172/1042384 · Cited by 6
Marshall, T. (1992) · BYTE archive · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Continued LOX Augmented Nuclear Thermal Rocket Testing
Bulman, M., Messitt, D., Neill, T., et al. (2002) · 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2002-3650
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Human Exploration 0, 2009, NASA-SP-2009-566
- Reference Mission Version 0, 1998, Exploration Office Document EX, 13, 036
- Borowski K., 2001, Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Propulsion for Power-Rich, Artificial Gravity Human Exploration Missions to Mars
- National Space, June 28, 2010, pg.11
- Durham F. P., 1972, Nuclear Engine Definition Study Preliminary Report, 1
- Kruger G. B., 1973, General Electric
- Houts M. G., 2012, Conference, paper #3093
- Borowski S. K., 2012, Global Space Exploration Conference
- 10.2514/6.1998-3883 · DOI
- Bulman M. J., 2002, AIAA-2002-3650
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hirschhorn, J., Hilty, F. W., Tonks, M., et al. (2021) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-021-04873-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Guo, L., Zhang, F., Lu, L., et al. (2021) · Tungsten · doi:10.1007/s42864-021-00117-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Nam, S. H., Venneri, P. F., Kim, Y., et al. (2016) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.02.008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Borowski, S. K., McCurdy, D. R., & Packard, T. (2014) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2014-3623 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Additional size and mass details on the Copernicus MTV are found elsewhere [34, 35].”
BackgroundSelf-citationKessing, J. R., Nadermann, A. T., Shaver, C. B., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/jace.70141 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
McGuire, M. L., Oleson, S. R., Burke, L., McCarty, S., Newman, J. M., Martini, M., & Smith, D. (2018) · 2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition · doi:10.2514/6.2018-5141 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“[10] Low thrust systems work best outside of the gravity wells”
BackgroundMaterial Characterization of Subscale Molybdenum Cermets for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion
Duffin, T. G., Zinkle, S. J., & Benensky, K. M. (2019) · AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2019-3945 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Integrated System Modeling for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP)
Ryan, S. W., & Borowski, S. K. (2014) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2014-3624 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationProduction and Hot Hydrogen Testing of Subscale Molybdenum Cermets for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion
Duffin, T. G., Benensky, K. M., Zinkle, S. J., et al. (2018) · AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference (JPC) · doi:10.2514/6.2018-4672 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
3 months transit time to Mars for human missions using SpaceX Starship
Kingdon, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-00565-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nuclear Wave Rotor Bi-Modal Cycle for In-Space Propulsion
Gosse, R. C., Osborne, G. F., Mahmood, H. H., et al. (2024) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2024-1238 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mass Gauging for Sustained Presence in Outer Space: A Technology Review
Parson, J., Roe, K., Feller, J. R., et al. (2021) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2021-0047 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Design and fabrication of TRISO based ZrC fuel for nuclear thermal propulsion
Gaffin, N. D., Ade, B., Crotzer, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Nuclear Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155538 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Scoping Analysis of Fuel Plate Core Configurations
Youinou, G., USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Lin, C.-S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.2172/1596107 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Propellant Alternatives of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Using Wave Rotor Pressure Exchanges
Osborne, G. F., & Gosse, R. C. (2025) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2025-0150 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Coupled Approach to the Design Space Exploration of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Systems
Petitgenet, V., Roper, C. D., Krecicki, M., et al. (2020) · AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-3846 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The National Space Exploration Campaign plans to build and expand upon NASA’s Mars Exploration Program (MEP) missions to further the United States’ leadership on Mars with subsequent crew missions in the near future [4].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPerformance investigation of a high-temperature and power Hall-effect electric propulsion
Li, L., Lu, X., Wang, W., et al. (2019) · Journal of Plasma Physics · doi:10.1017/s0022377819000746
The Bimodal Epithermal Astronuclear Reactor (BEAR): A LONG-LIVED, Universal Space Nuclear Powerplant
Widdicombe, T., Herring, J. S., & Kirkwood, B. (2024) · Nuclear Science and Technology Open Research · doi:10.12688/nuclscitechnolopenres.17481.1
Ezell, N. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering · doi:10.3389/fnuen.2024.1308045
The Bimodal Epithermal Astronuclear Reactor (BEAR): A Long-Lived, Universal Space Nuclear Powerplant
Widdicombe, T., Herring, J. S., & Kirkwood, B. (2024) · Nuclear Science and Technology Open Research · doi:10.12688/nuclscitechnolopenres.17481.2
Range Safety Considerations for Processing and Launching Reactor-Based Space Nuclear Systems
Herbert, A. P., Fisher, B., Granger, M., et al. (2024) · Nuclear Technology · doi:10.1080/00295450.2024.2431777
“…Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) program of the U.S. Air Force and NASA from 1987 through 1994, [3] the NTP program of NASA beginning in 2016, [4] and most recently, the Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) program of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which…”
Permeation through thin polymer films at cryogenic temperatures
Westra, K., & Leachman, J. (2026) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2026.104279
Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D. Y., Lee, S.-G., et al. (2026) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2026.112125
Study of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions: Case Study of Mars
Bhowmick, N., & Shifat, M. T. A. (2026) · SciEn Conference Series Engineering · doi:10.38032/scse.2026.4.105
“This approach allows for both reduced transit duration and increased delivered payload mass, which is especially crucial for Mars or more challenging outer planet missions [3, 4].”
Influence of Wave Rotor Thermal Decomposition on Alternative Nuclear Rocket Propellant Performance
Osborne, G. F., & Gosse, R. C. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19174047
- Authors
- Borowski, S. K., McCurdy, D., & Packard, T.
- Affiliations
- Glenn Research Center (US)
- Venue
- AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition
- Published
- 2013-09-10
- OpenAlex
- W1966964592
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- AIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Keywords
- nuclear thermal propulsion, Mars transit, human Mars missions, transit time reduction, Mars transfer vehicle, radiation dose, nuclear thermal rocket
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review