Cited by 21Space exploration and regulationSpacecraft Design and TechnologyPlanetary Science and Exploration

Lunar COTS: An Economical and Sustainable Approach to Reaching Mars

Open access
Zuniga, Allison F., Rasky, Daniel, Pittman, Robert B., Zapata, Edgar, Lepsch, Roger·2015·AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition

Abstract

The NASA COTS (Commercial Orbital Transportation Services) Program was a very successful program that developed and demonstrated cost-effective development and acquisition of commercial cargo transportation services to the International Space Station (ISS).The COTS acquisition strategy utilized a newer model than normally accepted in traditional procurement practices.This new model used Space Act Agreements where NASA entered into partnerships with industry to jointly share cost, development and operational risks to demonstrate new capabilities for mutual benefit.This model proved to be very beneficial to both NASA and its industry partners as NASA saved significantly in development and operational costs while industry partners successfully expanded their market share of the global launch transportation business.The authors, who contributed to the development of the COTS model, would like to extend this model to a lunar commercial services program that will push development of technologies and capabilities that will serve a Mars architecture and lead to an economical and sustainable pathway to transporting humans to Mars.Over the past few decades, several architectures for the Moon and Mars have been proposed and studied but ultimately halted or not even started due to the projected costs significantly exceeding NASA's budgets.Therefore a new strategy is needed that will fit within NASA's projected budgets and takes advantage of the US commercial industry along with its creative and entrepreneurial attributes.The authors propose a new COTS-like program to enter into partnerships with industry to demonstrate cost-effective, cis-lunar commercial services, such as lunar transportation, lunar ISRU operations, and cislunar propellant depots that can enable an economical and sustainable Mars architecture.Similar to the original COTS program, the goals of the proposed program, being notionally referred to as Lunar Commercial Orbital Transfer Services (LCOTS) program will be to: 1) reduce development and operational costs by sharing costs with industry; 2) create new markets in cis-lunar space to further reduce operational costs; and 3) enable NASA to develop an affordable and economical exploration Mars architecture.The paper will describe a plan for a proposed LCOTS program, its potential impact to an eventual Mars architecture and its many benefits to NASA, commercial space industry and the US economy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2015-4408

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the contemporary costs of space transportation, total power system mass presents a subject of thorough optimization.

    “Considering the contemporary costs of space transportation, [29-32] total power system mass presents a subject of thorough optimization.”

    From Parametric Study of a Lunar Base Power Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. National Research Council, "Pathways to Exploration: Rationales and Approaches for a US Program of Human Space Exploration," The National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2014.
  2. Hecht, M.H. and Hoffman, J.A., "The Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment on the Mars 2020 Rover," 46 th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuniga, A. F., Rasky, D., Pittman, R. B., Zapata, E., & Lepsch, R.
Affiliations
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • Langley Research Center (US)
Venue
AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition
Published
2015-08-28
OpenAlex
W2270736861
Cited by
21
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIAA SPACE Conference & Exposition (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
Mars architecture, Space Act Agreement, cislunar space, lunar in-situ resource utilization, lunar transportation, cost sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review