Cited by 156Systems Engineering Methodologies and ApplicationsTechnology Assessment and ManagementComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

The Air Force Digital Thread/Digital Twin - Life Cycle Integration and Use of Computational and Experimental Knowledge

Kraft, Edward M.·2016·54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

Abstract

Computational and experimental fluid dynamics have been integrated into aeronautical system development processes in varying degrees over the last forty years and have yet to achieve their full promise for reducing the cost and time for development. What has been missing is a holistic advance in the integration not just of computers and wind tunnels but of the organizational constructs and development processes that enable unleashing the full capability of integrated computational and experimental methods. Recent Department of Defense (DoD) policies and guidance focused on organic engineering capabilities, government insight into technical performance, and application of system models over the life cycle are enabling a major paradigm shift toward life cycle integration of computational and experimental knowledge. In conjunction with these new policies, the United States Air Force is developing and applying a Digital Thread/Digital Twin analytical framework to provide engineering analysis capabilities and support to decision making over the entire lifecycle of air vehicles. The Digital Thread/Digital Twin merges physics-based modeling and experimental data to generate an authoritative digital representation of the system at each phase of the acquisition and sustainment process of a weapon system. In this paper the history of integrated computational and experimental fluid dynamics is reviewed as a precursor for the emerging paradigm shift toward a virtual government monopsony…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2016-0897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 156

Authors
Kraft, E. M.
Affiliations
Arnold Engineering Development Center
Corresponding author
Kraft, Edward M.
Venue
54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
Published
2016-01-02
OpenAlex
W2317992223
Cited by
156
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Technology Assessment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Keywords
digital thread, digital twin, life cycle integration, physics-based modeling, experimental data integration, decision support, knowledge management, United States Air Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review