Optimal Continuous-Time Job Scheduling for Multiple Low Earth Orbit Satellites
Abstract
This paper proposes a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) formulation for job scheduling of a constellation of low earth orbit satellites and investigates the applicability/scalability of a standard MILP solver that produces the optimal solution. The goal of the satellite constellation job scheduling is to allocate each job for satellites and to determine the job starting times in order to maximize the overall mission performance measure. The scheduling problem is formulated by first selecting and timetabling the job (observation activities) to acquire the user-requested data of the Earth surface, with incorporating satellite operational constraints such as visibility time windows, transition time between consecutive jobs, maximum attitude angle, energy capacity, memory capacity. The proposed formulation relaxes some of these constraints, which would not have impacts on real instances, but additionally includes precedence condition between jobs and job-agent compatibility constraints. An off-the-shelf MILP solver is used to obtain the optimal solution for this scheduling formulation; numerical experiments designed for investigating the applicability of the optimal solver in terms of problem size indicates that the optimal solution can be obtained in a tractable manner up to the problem size with three satellites and hundreds of jobs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Maximizing the value of an Earth observation satellite orbit
Cordeau, J.-F., & Laporte, G. (2005) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601926 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimization-Based Scheduling Method for Agile Earth-Observing Satellite Constellation
Cho, D.-H., Kim, J.-H., Choi, H.-L., & Ahn, J. (2018) · Journal of Aerospace Information Systems · doi:10.2514/1.i010620 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, K., Kim, D., Chung, D., & Lee, S. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202403.0331.v1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cho, D.-H., Kim, H.-Y., & Choi, H.-L.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
- ORCID
- Cho, Doo-Hyun
- Venue
- AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2281232126
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Keywords
- low Earth orbit satellites, job scheduling, mixed-integer linear programming, timetabling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review