Cited by 4Spacecraft Design and TechnologyRocket and propulsion systems researchAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

Sensitivity of Hybrid NEP-Chemical Vehicle Mass to Assumptions for Crewed Opposition-Class Mars Missions

Duchek, Matthew E., Pensado, Alejandro, Clark, Matteo, Harnack, Christopher, Grella, Emanuel, Machemer, William, Qu, Min·2021·AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum

Abstract

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-3612.vid This research illustrates the impact of different technology choices and their associated performance on overall sizing for a hybrid Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) and chemical crewed Mars transportation vehicle. A set of models for the trajectory and vehicle mass, power system specific mass (alpha), and power conversion performance enable the analysis. Vehicle mass required to close the mission is calculated as a function of alpha and specific impulse (Isp) for multiple choices of high-level assumptions including system alpha vs. power scaling and electric thruster type. System alpha is built up and compared for multiple cases of technology assumptions. A Brayton cycle model is used to illustrate the alpha sensitivities to assumptions in cycle design such as peak operating temperature and component performance. The analysis illustrates how technology performance sensitivities affect the alpha and thus vehicle sizing for a range of mission and technology assumptions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2021-3612

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Duchek M., 2021, JANNAF
  2. Davis J. E., 1972, AIRESEARCH MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF ARIZONA
  3. Mason L., 2005, Heat Rejection Concepts for Brayton Power
  4. Frisbee R. H., 2005, AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit
  5. Sanchez T., 2006, Sandia National Laboratories
  6. Harper A., 1979, Study of Reactor Brayton Power Systems for Nuclear Electric Spacecraft
  7. Dussinger P., 2011, Industrial Heating

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duchek, M. E., Pensado, A., Clark, M., Harnack, C., Grella, E., Machemer, W., & Qu, M.
Affiliations
Analytical Mechanics Associates (United States) (US)
Venue
AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum
Published
2021-07-28
OpenAlex
W3187042790
Cited by
4
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Keywords
nuclear electric propulsion, human Mars missions, Brayton cycle, electric thrusters, specific impulse, power conversion efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review