A 1 MW Solar Electric and Chemical Propulsion Vehicle for Piloted Mars Opposition Class Missions
Abstract
Previous investigations have extensively explored crew missions to and from Mars, with a prevailing approach termed the 'conjunction' class, necessitating an approximately 500-day stay at Mars for a cost-effective return. However, this configuration results in a mission duration exceeding 1000 days (roughly 3 years). In order to reduce crew health and surface operations risks, a shortened mission duration of 850 days is being explored by using a short ~30 day Mars surface stay and a ‘opposition’ class approach. A non-nuclear approach is possible by combining solar electric propulsion and a chemical stage. While past mission concepts for the conjunction missions also used solar electric propulsion they limited the SEP power to <700 kW. In order to achieve the 850 day round trip more SEP power is needed. A 1MW class SEP-Chem vehicle was found sufficient to perform the 850 day mission. The biggest challenge for the design will be the large, high power solar arrays, mainly from their deployment and stability. This work describes the design of the SEP-Chem vehicle, assembled in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) and employing super-heavy class and the Space Launch System (SLS) launchers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, Q., Jia, Y.-H., Sun, X., et al. (2024) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/5.0236397 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Transformational Propulsion for Fast In-Space Transits
Dankanich, J., Burke, L. M., Carr, J. A., et al. (2024) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2024-1808 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sensitivity Analysis of CFM Technologies for Combined NEP-Chemical Mars Missions
Turnbull, E. R., Oleson, S. R., Burke, L. M., et al. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero63441.2025.11068634
“The modifications made to the Chem Stage for this application are identical to those made in ref [3].”
InfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Oleson, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Glenn Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oleson, Steven R.
- Venue
- ASCEND 2023
- Published
- 2023-10-17
- OpenAlex
- W4387741364
- Semantic Scholar
- bae2fe65dbfa34780ed18e0d8745f861c2943598
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Keywords
- solar electric propulsion, chemical propulsion, human Mars missions, solar arrays, near rectilinear halo orbit, Space Launch System
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review