Cited by 143Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports Performance and Training

Reference Values for Concentric Knee Isokinetic Strength and Power in Nonathletic Men and Women from 20 to 80 Years Old

Open access
Neder, J. Alberto, Nery, Luiz E., Shinzato, Gilson T., Andrade, Marilia S., Peres, Clovis, Silva, Antonio C.·1999·Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, controlled, randomized study. OBJECTIVE: To establish reference values for prediction of concentric isokinetic knee strength and power in a sample of nonathletic men and women. BACKGROUND: Adequate interpretation of knee isokinetic strength and power relies on a representative frame of reference. However, none of the most widely cited prediction studies used a randomly selected sample of nonathletic subjects, therefore limiting the clinical application of these studies. METHODS AND MEASURES: We evaluated the concentric right and left knee extensor and flexor peak torque, total work, set total work, average power, and torque acceleration energy (Cybex 6000 System) in 96 healthy subjects (45 men and 51 women, aged 20 to 80), randomly selected from more than 8000 individuals. RESULTS: By stepwise regression analysis, we found that gender, age, weight, height, and regular physical activity explained up to 84% of the variability of the dependent variables: a set of linear prediction equations for strength (at 60 degrees/s) and power (at 300 degrees/s) is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study might provide a clinically useful frame of reference for interpretation of concentric isokinetic knee strength and power in nonathletic men and women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.2.116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 143

Authors
Neder, J. A., Nery, L. E., Shinzato, G. T., Andrade, M. S., Peres, C., & Silva, A. C.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Published
1999-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
116-126
ISSN
  • 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1344
OpenAlex
W2085730915
Cited by
143
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
reference values, knee extensors, knee flexors, peak torque, prediction equations, age and sex differences, physical activity, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Knee, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review