The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Do Recreational Runners Think About Risk Factors for Running Injuries? A Descriptive Study of Their Beliefs and Opinions
Abstract
Study Design: Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. Objectives: To describe the beliefs and opinions of runners about risk factors associated with running injuries. Background: Despite the health benefits of running, a high prevalence of injury has been reported in runners. Preventive strategies for running injuries may be more successful with a better knowledge of runners' beliefs. Methods: A semi-structured interview of recreational runners was based on the question, “What do you think can cause injuries in runners?” Analysis of the interviews was performed in 3 steps: (1) organizing the data into thematic units, (2) reading and reorganizing the data according to frequency of citation, and (3) interpreting and summarizing the data. The runner interviews were continued until no new beliefs and opinions of runners regarding injuries were being added to the data, indicating saturation of the topic. Results: A total of 95 recreational runners (65 men, 30 women) between the ages of 19 and 71 years were interviewed. Of those interviewed, the average running experience was 5.5 years and approximately 45% had experienced a running-related injury in the past. The factors suggested by the runners were divided into extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The most cited extrinsic factors were “not stretching,” “excess of training,” “not warming up,” “lack of strength,” and “wearing the wrong shoes.” For the intrinsic factors, the main terms cited were “not respecting the body's limitations” and “foot-type changes.” Conclusion: Recreational runners mainly attributed injury to factors related to training, running shoes, and exceeding the body's limits. Knowing the factors identified in this study may contribute to the development of better educational strategies to prevent running injuries, as some of the runners' beliefs are not supported by the research literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(10):733–738. Epub 25 August 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5710
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of German Olympian athletes, the elite group had a positive correlation to risk acceptance both physical and social within their sport environment.
“Similar findings were highlighted in a study of German Olympian athletes, whereby the elite group had a positive correlation to risk acceptance both physical and social within their sport environment [70].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [70]
Citations
Cites
Shrier, I. (1999) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/00042752-199910000-00007 · Cited by 211
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1136/bjsm.2009.066936 · DOI
- Carmack MA, 1979, J Sport Exerc Psychol., 1, 25, 10.1123/jsp.1.1.25 · DOI
- Chapman CL, 1990, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 30, 283
- 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091524 · DOI
- 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181de7ec5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.026 · DOI
- 10.2466/pms.1981.52.1.153 · DOI
- 10.2466/pms.1981.53.2.395 · DOI
- Herbert RD, 2007, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., CD004577
- 10.2165/00007256-199213060-00004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.013 · DOI
- 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0fc63 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546510369548 · DOI
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb132956.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03262301 · DOI
- 10.2165/11534960-000000000-00000 · DOI
- 10.1097/00042752-199407000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3180592a48 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092202 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.2008.046680 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069849 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40279-014-0194-6 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033548 · DOI
- 10.2165/00007256-199214020-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.11.253 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.2009.066316 · DOI
- 10.2165/11536890-000000000-00000 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11932-007-0067-y · DOI
- Yeung SS, 2011, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., CD001256
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Saragiotto, B. T., Yamato, T. P., & Lopes, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 733-738
- ISSN
- 0190-6011
- 1938-1344
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review