Cited by 7Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Education

Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Should it be included in the medical curriculum? A students’ perspective

Open access
BANSAL, MANISHI, JINDAL, ANKUSH·2022·The National Medical Journal of India

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has increased due to rapid digitization and integration of computer science in all fields. However, the outcome in relation to patient treatment and healthcare delivery is not that visible. The reasons could be non-availability of data, lack of computerization and financial constraints. Besides this, the lack of appropriate teaching at undergraduate level about AI and its medical applications could be an obstacle. Including AI in medical school curriculum and collaboration with faculties of computer science can augment the knowledge of medical students about AI at the graduate level for better application in the real world. This will help the medical profession to prepare their younger fraternity for the future in AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25259/nmji_208_20

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contributions elaborated mainly or solely by medical students strongly call for the inclusion of AI education in medical curricula; students were enthusiastic about learning AI and recognized its crucial role in the future of medicine, but reported a lack of formal AI training and insufficient AI-related learning opportunities; researchers and educators also demanded inclusion of AI in medical Cur

    “Finally, contributions elaborated mainly or solely by medical students strongly call for the inclusion of AI education in medical curricula [50–54]. Students were enthusiastic about learning AI and recognized its crucial role in the future of medicine [45, 55]. However, they reported a lack of formal AI training and insufficient AI-related learning opportunities in their medical education [46, 56,”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [50]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies pointed to the infrastructure, financial resources, and investments necessary to implement AI-driven education methods, as the costs of servers, faculty training, tool development, and technical personnel could be substantial.

    “Finally, several studies pointed to the infrastructure, financial resources, and investments necessary to implement AI-driven education methods [9, 50, 181], as the costs of servers, faculty training, tool development, and technical personnel could be substantial [182–184].”

    From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [50]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE. AI magazine Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. 1955. Available at https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/index (accessed on 15 Dec 2006)
  2. Jindal A, Bansal M. Knowledge and education about artificial intelligence among medical students from teaching institutions of India. Med Ed Publish. 2020;9:200.
  3. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence In: A modern approach (Global edition). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BANSAL, M., & JINDAL, A.
Affiliations
  • Fortis Hospital (IN)
  • Government Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
JINDAL, ANKUSH
Venue
The National Medical Journal of India
Published
2022-08-23
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
56-58
ISSN
0970-258X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293113509
Cited by
7
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The National Medical Journal of India (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, medical curriculum, medical education, undergraduate medical education, interdisciplinary collaboration
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review