The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation
Abstract
The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) has a kinetic submodel that predicts ruminal fermentation. The ruminal microbial population is divided into bacteria that ferment structural carbohydrate (SC) and those that ferment nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC). Protozoa are accommodated by a decrease in the theoretical maximum growth yield (.50 vs .40 g of cells per gram of carbohydrate fermented), and the yields are adjusted for maintenance requirements (.05 vs .150 g of cell dry weight per gram of carbohydrate fermented per hour for SC and NSC bacteria, respectively). Bacterial yield is decreased when forage NDF is < 20% (2.5% for every 1% decrease in NDF). The SC bacteria utilize only ammonia as a N source, but the NSC bacteria can utilize either ammonia or peptides. The yield of NSC bacteria is enhanced by as much as 18.7% when proteins or peptides are available. The NSC bacteria produce less ammonia when the carbohydrate fermentation (growth) rate is rapid, but 34% of the ammonia production is insensitive to the rate of carbohydrate fermentation. Ammonia production rates are moderated by the rate of peptide and amino acid uptake (.07 g of peptide per gram of cells per hour), and peptides and amino acids can pass out of the rumen if the rate of proteolysis is faster than the rate of peptide utilization. The protein-sparing effect of ionophores is accommodated by decreasing the rate of peptide uptake by 34%. Validation with published data of microbial flow from the rumen gave a regression with a slope of .94 and an r2 of .88.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311
Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions
Russell, J. B., & Cook, G. M. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.48-62.1995 · Cited by 927
Self-citationThe Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G., & Blok, M. C. (1994) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(94)90043-4 · Cited by 601
In vitro gas production: a technique revisited
Blümmel, M., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (1997) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00734.x · Cited by 448
The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system: updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5
Van Amburgh, M. E., Collao-Saenz, E. A., Higgs, R. J., Ross, D. A., Recktenwald, E. B., Raffrenato, E., Chase, L. E., Overton, T. R., Mills, J. K., & Foskolos, A. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9378 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, J. B., O'Connor, J. D., Fox, D. G., Van Soest, P. J., & Sniffen, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3551-3561
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W37539108
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1992.70113551x
- The paper
- Russell, J. B., O'Connor, J. D., Fox, D. G., Van Soest, P. J., & Sniffen, C. J. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113551x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.