The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability
Abstract
The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) has a submodel that predicts rates of feedstuff degradation in the rumen, the passage of undegraded feed to the lower gut, and the amount of ME and protein that is available to the animal. In the CNCPS, structural carbohydrate (SC) and nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) are estimated from sequential NDF analyses of the feed. Data from the literature are used to predict fractional rates of SC and NSC degradation. Crude protein is partitioned into five fractions. Fraction A is NPN, which is trichloroacetic (TCA) acid-soluble N. Unavailable or protein bound to cell wall (Fraction C) is derived from acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIP), and slowly degraded true protein (Fraction B3) is neutral detergent insoluble nitrogen (NDIP) minus Fraction C. Rapidly degraded true protein (Fraction B1) is TCA-precipitable protein from the buffer-soluble protein minus NPN. True protein with an intermediate degradation rate (Fraction B2) is the remaining N. Protein degradation rates are estimated by an in vitro procedure that uses Streptomyces griseus protease, and a curve-peeling technique is used to identify rates for each fraction. The amount of carbohydrate or N that is digested in the rumen is determined by the relative rates of degradation and passage. Ruminal passage rates are a function of DMI, particle size, bulk density, and the type of feed that is consumed (e.g., forage vs cereal grain).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
Cited by
Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311
Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions
Russell, J. B., & Cook, G. M. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.48-62.1995 · Cited by 927
Self-citationThe Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G., & Blok, M. C. (1994) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(94)90043-4 · Cited by 601
Getachew, G., Robinson, P. H., DePeters, E. J., & Taylor, S. J. (2004) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00217-7 · Cited by 417
The role of Δ9-desaturase in the production of cis-9, trans-11 CLA
Corl, B. A., Baumgard, L. H., Dwyer, D. A., Griinari, J. M., Phillips, B. S., & Bauman, D. E. (2001) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0955-2863(01)00180-2 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Sniffen, C. J., O'Connor, J. D., Van Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G., & Russell, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3562-3577
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1595105750
- Cited by
- 3,572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1992.70113562x
- The paper
- Sniffen, C. J., O'Connor, J. D., Van Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G., & Russell, J. B. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.