Effect of days fed, carcass grade traits, and subcutaneous fat removal on postmortem muscle characteristics and beef palatability
Abstract
Angus x Hereford steers (n = 48) similar in frame size and in muscle thickness were allotted to eight groups (n = 6) of similar mean live weight for serial slaughter at 28-d intervals (0 to 196 d). Except for d-0 steers, which served as grass-fed controls, all steers were fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period. Upon slaughter, one side of each carcass was trimmed of subcutaneous fat in the wholesale rib region. Postmortem longissimus muscle (LM) temperature was monitored for each side during the 24-h chilling period. After quality and yield grade data were collected, rib steaks were removed and aged (7 d) and sensory traits of the steaks were evaluated. Most carcass grade traits increased linearly (P less than .01) with days on feed, whereas most sensory panel variables and marbling increased curvilinearly (P less than .05). Generally, after 56 d on feed, carcasses chilled at slower rates (P less than .05) with increased days fed. Taste panel tenderness, amount of perceived connective tissue, and shear force values peaked at 112 d and were slightly less desirable for cattle fed longer than 112 d (quadratic term, P less than .01). Postmortem muscle temperature at 2.5 h was the chilling time most highly correlated with tenderness values among untrimmed sides. Correlations for shear force with 2.5-h LM temperature, marbling score, days fed, fat thickness, and carcass weight were -.63, -.61, -.56, -.55, and -.53, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another study found a better yield grade of 1.4 in Angus × Hereford grass-fed steers that were employed as control and never received any supplement.
“Another study found a better yield grade of 1.4 in Angus  Hereford grass-fed steers that were employed as control and never received any supplement (May et al., 1992)”
From Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers (2021) · cites this paper as May et al., 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Elswyk, M. E., & McNeill, S. H. (2014) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.010 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers
Carrillo, J. A., Bai, Y., He, Y., Li, Y., Cai, W., Bickhart, D. M., Liu, G., Barao, S. M., Sonstegard, T., & Song, J. (2021) · Animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100381 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- May, S. G., Dolezal, H. G., Gill, D. R., Ray, F. K., & Buchanan, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Oklahoma State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dolezal, H. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-02-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 444-453
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W345328610
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
- Keywords
- beef tenderness, beef palatability, days on feed, longissimus dorsi, shear force, marbling, connective tissue
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Animals, Cattle, Eating, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Meat, Muscles, Postmortem Changes, Sarcomeres, Skin, Taste, Temperature, Weight Gain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review