Cited by 207Meat and Animal Product QualityRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyPharmacological Effects and Assays

Effect of days fed, carcass grade traits, and subcutaneous fat removal on postmortem muscle characteristics and beef palatability

May, S. G., Dolezal, H. G., Gill, D. R., Ray, F. K., Buchanan, D. S.·1992·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Angus x Hereford steers (n = 48) similar in frame size and in muscle thickness were allotted to eight groups (n = 6) of similar mean live weight for serial slaughter at 28-d intervals (0 to 196 d). Except for d-0 steers, which served as grass-fed controls, all steers were fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period. Upon slaughter, one side of each carcass was trimmed of subcutaneous fat in the wholesale rib region. Postmortem longissimus muscle (LM) temperature was monitored for each side during the 24-h chilling period. After quality and yield grade data were collected, rib steaks were removed and aged (7 d) and sensory traits of the steaks were evaluated. Most carcass grade traits increased linearly (P less than .01) with days on feed, whereas most sensory panel variables and marbling increased curvilinearly (P less than .05). Generally, after 56 d on feed, carcasses chilled at slower rates (P less than .05) with increased days fed. Taste panel tenderness, amount of perceived connective tissue, and shear force values peaked at 112 d and were slightly less desirable for cattle fed longer than 112 d (quadratic term, P less than .01). Postmortem muscle temperature at 2.5 h was the chilling time most highly correlated with tenderness values among untrimmed sides. Correlations for shear force with 2.5-h LM temperature, marbling score, days fed, fat thickness, and carcass weight were -.63, -.61, -.56, -.55, and -.53, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/1992.702444x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another study found a better yield grade of 1.4 in Angus × Hereford grass-fed steers that were employed as control and never received any supplement.

    “Another study found a better yield grade of 1.4 in Angus  Hereford grass-fed steers that were employed as control and never received any supplement (May et al., 1992)”

    From Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers (2021) · cites this paper as May et al., 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
May, S. G., Dolezal, H. G., Gill, D. R., Ray, F. K., & Buchanan, D. S.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dolezal, H. G.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1992-02-01
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
444-453
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W345328610
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
beef tenderness, beef palatability, days on feed, longissimus dorsi, shear force, marbling, connective tissue
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Cattle, Eating, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Meat, Muscles, Postmortem Changes, Sarcomeres, Skin, Taste, Temperature, Weight Gain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review