The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mycotoxins and reproduction in domestic livestock1
Abstract
Molds are parasitic plants that are ubiquitous in livestock feedstuffs. Even though molds themselves reduce the quality of grains, their synthesis of chemical substances termed mycotoxins causes the greatest monetary loss to the animal industry. Five major mycotoxins that impair growth and reproductive efficiency in North America are aflatoxins, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin, and ergot. Aflatoxins are produced by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Consumption of grains containing aflatoxins by swine affects reproduction indirectly by reducing feed intake and growth. In swine, aflatoxins impair liver and kidney function, delay blood clotting, increase susceptibility to bruising, and interfere with cellular humoral immune systems. Ruminants are comparatively resistant to aflatoxicosis, but presence of aflatoxins in milk of dairy cows is closely monitored for human safety. Depending on environmental conditions, Fusarium roseum can produce either zearalenone or deoxynivalenol. Days 7 to 10 postmating seem to be a critical period of gestation for zearalenone to exert its detrimental actions on early embryonic development. Presence of deoxynivalenol in swine feedstuffs decreases feed intake, causes feed refusal, and induces occasional vomiting. Several species of Penicillium and Aspergillus produce ochratoxin, a mycotoxin that causes necrosis of kidney tissue. Ergot alkaloids produced by Claviceps purpurea on wheat can cause reproductive problems and are associated with lactational failure in swine. Various methods have been developed to remove mycotoxins from infected feedstuffs. Chemical analyses in laboratories as well as diagnostic kits suitable for use at the elevator or farm can be used successfully to identify which mycotoxins are present in suspect feedstuffs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risks for animal health related to the presence of zearalenone and its modified forms in feed
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C., Knutsen, H., Alexander, J., Barregård, L., Bignami, M., Brüschweiler, B., Ceccatelli, S., Cottrill, B., Dinovi, M., Edler, L., et al. (2017) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4851 · Cited by 292
Aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products, occurrence and recent challenges: A review
Iqbal, S. Z., Jinap, S., Pirouz, A. A., & Ahmad Faizal, A. R. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.08.005 · Cited by 277
Niderkorn, V., Morgavi, D. P., Pujos, E., Tissandier, A., & Boudra, H. (2007) · Food Additives and Contaminants · doi:10.1080/02652030601101110 · Cited by 126
Food-Borne Mycotoxicoses: Pathologies and Public Health Impact
Patial, V., Asrani, R. K., & Thakur, M. (2018) · Foodborne Diseases · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811444-5.00009-9 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Diekman, M. A., & Green, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1615-1627
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2418388321
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mycotoxins and reproduction in domestic livestock1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1992.7051615x
- The paper
- Diekman, M. A., & Green, M. L. (1992). Mycotoxins and reproduction in domestic livestock1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.7051615x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.