The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding.
Open accessAbstract
A method was derived that maximizes the genetic level of selected animals while constraining their average coancestry to a predefined value. The average coancestry of the selected parents equals the inbreeding level in the next generation, so that rates of inbreeding were controlled. When this method was applied for several generations of selection, stable rates of genetic gain were attained, which indicates that the method could control the short- and long-term effects of selection on inbreeding. At equal rates of inbreeding, genetic gains were 21 to 60% greater than that with selection for BLUP-EBV, because of increased selection differentials. The difference was larger when the desirable rate of inbreeding was smallest. Selection with a constraint on inbreeding required only EBV of, and relationships between, the selection candidates and is therefore easy to apply in practice. The optimal solution is expressed in genetic contributions of selection candidates to the next generation, which is equivalent to numbers of offspring per candidate. These optimal numbers of offspring may be difficult to attain because of female reproductive limitations. The optimal method could be adapted to situations with additional reproductive constraints. The method can also be used to constrain the variance of response by restricting the average prediction error variance of the selected animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics.
Weir, B. S., & Bulmer, M. G. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530175 · Cited by 701
Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness
Meuwissen, T. H. E., & Woolliams, J. A. (1994) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00224533 · Cited by 218
Self-citationPrediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations
Wray, N. R., & Thompson, R. (1990) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300025180 · Cited by 177
Increasing long-term response to selection
Wray, N., & Goddard, M. (1994) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-26-5-431 · Cited by 174
Effective size of populations under selection.
Santiago, E., & Caballero, A. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/139.2.1013 · Cited by 157
Long-term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population
Verrier, É., Colleau, J. J. J. J., & Foulley, J. (1993) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00215090 · Cited by 87
Meuwissen, T. H. E., & Woolliams, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)77133-2 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Cited by
Langhammer, M., Michaelis, M., Hartmann, M. F., Wudy, S. A., Sobczak, A., Nürnberg, G., Reinsch, N., Schön, J., & Weitzel, J. M. (2017) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-16-0434 · Cited by 17
Jensen, K., Thormose, S. F., Noer, N. K., Schou, T. M., Kargo, M., Gligorescu, A., Nørgaard, J. V., Hansen, L. S., Zaalberg, R. M., Nielsen, H. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Insects as Food and Feed · doi:10.1163/23524588-bja10205 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Meuwissen, T. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 934
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1513158650
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1997.754934x
- The paper
- Meuwissen, T. H. (1997). Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.754934x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.