The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet.
Abstract
We measured effects of continuous vs twice-daily feeding, the addition of unsaturated fat to the diet, and monensin on milk production, milk composition, feed intake, and CO2-methane production in four experiments in a herd of 88 to 109 milking Holsteins. Methane and CO2 production increased with twice-daily feeding, but the CO2:CH4 ratio remained unchanged. Soybean oil did not affect the milkfat percentages, but fatty acid composition was changed. All saturated fatty acids up to and including 16:0 decreased (P < .01), whereas 18:0 and trans 18:1 increased (P < .001). The 18:2 conjugated dienes also increased (P < .01) when the cows were fed soybean oil. Monensin addition to the diet at 24 ppm decreased methane production (P < .01); the CO2:CH4 ratios reached 15, milk production increased (P < .01), and milkfat percentage and total milkfat output decreased (P < .01), as did feed consumption, compared with cows fed diets without monensin (P < .05). Milk fatty acid composition showed evidence of depressed ruminal biohydrogenation: saturated fatty acids (P < .05) decreased and 18:1 increased (P < .001); most of the increase was seen in the trans 18:1 isomer. As with soybean oil feeding, addition of monensin also increased (P < .05) the concentration of conjugated dienes. The monensin feeding trial was repeated 161 d later with 88 cows, of which 67 received monensin in the diet in the first trial and 21 cows were newly freshened and had never received monensin. Methane production again decreased (P < .05), but this time the CO2:CH4 ratio did not change and all other monensin-related effects were absent. The ruminal microflora in the cows that had previously received monensin seemed to have undergone some adaptive changes and no longer responded as before.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
Beauchemin, K. A., Kreuzer, M., O'Mara, F., & McAllister, T. A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07199 · Cited by 1,162
Chilliard, Y., Ferlay, A., & Doreau, M. (2001) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(01)00196-8 · Cited by 593
Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle
Ellis, J. L., Kebreab, E., Odongo, N. E., McBride, B. W., Okine, E. K., & France, J. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-675 · Cited by 414
The role of microbes in rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation and their manipulation
Lourenço, M., Ramos-Morales, E., & Wallace, R. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s175173111000042x · Cited by 401
Martin, C., Rouel, J., Jouany, J. P., Doreau, M., & Chilliard, Y. (2008) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0774 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauer, F. D., Fellner, V, Kinsman, R., Kramer, J. K., Jackson, H. A., Lee, A. J., & Chen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 906
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2414972710
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1998.763906x
- The paper
- Sauer, F. D., Fellner, V, Kinsman, R., Kramer, J. K., Jackson, H. A., Lee, A. J., & Chen, S. (1998). Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.763906x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.