Cited by 21Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesSperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Relationships of gonadotropins, testosterone, and cortisol in response to GnRH and GnRH antagonist in boars selected for high and low follicle-stimulating hormone levels.

Wise, T, Zanella, E L, Lunstra, D D, Ford, J J·2000·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Considerable variation exists in the serum levels of gonadotropins in boars; this results in differential testicular function. Boars (Chinese Meishan, European White composite, and crosses of the two breeds) selected for high and low circulating FSH concentrations were used to define possible differences in pituitary sensitivity to GnRH and GnRH antagonist and gonadal and adrenal responses. After a 2-h pretreatment sampling period, boars were injected with GnRH or GnRH antagonist and repetitively sampled via jugular cannula for changes in serum concentrations of FSH, LH, testosterone, and cortisol. In response to varying doses of GnRH or GnRH antagonist, FSH, LH, or testosterone changes were not different in high- or low-FSH boars. Declines in LH after GnRH stimulation were consistently faster in boars selected for high FSH. Chinese Meishan boars had considerably higher cortisol concentrations than White composite boars (132.2 +/- 28.5 vs 67.4 +/- 26.8 ng/mL, respectively; P < .01). When select high- and low-gonadotropin Meishan:White composite crossbreds were sampled, cortisol levels were elevated but comparable between the two groups (126.5 +/- 13.7 vs 131.4 +/- 13.4 ng/mL, respectively). After GnRH antagonist lowered LH concentrations, administration of hCG resulted in increased testosterone and cortisol concentrations. Although testosterone concentrations remained high for 30 h, cortisol concentrations returned to normal levels within 10 h after hCG injection. The mechanism by which boars selected for high gonadotropins achieve increased levels of LH and FSH may not be due to differences in pituitary sensitivity to GnRH but to differences in clearance from the circulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/2000.7861577x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wise, T., Zanella, E. L., Lunstra, D. D., & Ford, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Wise, T
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2000
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
1577
ISSN
0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409358974
Cited by
21
References
37
Citations by year
2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
gonadotropins, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, cortisol, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, GnRH antagonist, boars, crossbred pigs, pituitary sensitivity, human chorionic gonadotropin, testicular function
MeSH terms
Animals, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Gonadotropins, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Hormone Antagonists, Hydrocortisone, Luteinizing Hormone, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Male, Swine, Testosterone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review