The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mammary tissue damage during bovine mastitis: Causes and control1
Abstract
Mastitis, an inflammatory reaction of the mammary gland that is usually caused by a microbial infection, is recognized as the most costly disease in dairy cattle. Decreased milk production accounts for approximately 70% of the total cost of mastitis. Mammary tissue damage reduces the number and activity of epithelial cells and consequently contributes to decreased milk production. Mammary tissue damage has been shown to be induced by either apoptosis or necrosis. These 2 distinct types of cell death can be distinguished by morphological, biochemical, and molecular changes in dying cells. Both bacterial factors and host immune reactions contribute to epithelial tissue damage. During infection of the mammary glands, the tissue damage can initially be caused by bacteria and their products. Certain bacteria produce toxins that destroy cell membranes and damage milk-producing tissue, whereas other bacteria are able to invade and multiply within the bovine mammary epithelial cells before causing cell death. In addition, mastitis is characterized by an influx of somatic cells, primarily polymorphonuclear neutrophils, into the mammary gland. With more immune cells migrating into the mammary gland and the breakdown of the blood-milk barrier, damage to the mammary epithelium worsens. It is well known that breakdown of the extracellular matrix can lead to death of the epithelial cells. Meanwhile, polymorphonuclear neutrophils can harm the mammary tissue by releasing reactive oxygen intermediates and proteolytic enzymes. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the use of antioxidants and other protective compounds in mastitis control programs is worth investigating, because they may aid in alleviating damage to secretory cells and thus reduce subsequent milk loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neutrophil granules and secretory vesicles in inflammation
Faurschou, M., & Borregaard, N. (2003) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2003.09.008 · Cited by 1,162
Potential Therapeutic Effect of Antioxidant Therapy in Shock and Inflammation
Cuzzocrea, S., Thiemermann, C., & Salvemini, D. (2004) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867043365396 · Cited by 129
Cited by
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals1,2
Hausman, G. J., Dodson, M. V., Ajuwon, K., Azain, M., Barnes, K. M., Guan, L. L., Jiang, Z., Poulos, S. P., Sainz, R. D., Smith, S., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1427 · Cited by 342
Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine
Peton, V., & Le Loir, Y. (2014) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.011 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., & Lacasse, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- suppl_13
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2070213312
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammary tissue damage during bovine mastitis: Causes and control1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas.2007-0302
- The paper
- Zhao, X., & Lacasse, P. (2008). Mammary tissue damage during bovine mastitis: Causes and control1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.