Relationships of barometric pressure and environmental temperature with incidence of parturition in beef cows1
Abstract
The relationship between barometric pressure (BARO) and maximum (MAX_T) and minimum (MIN_T) environmental temperatures with the incidence of parturition in beef cows was examined through exploratory data analysis. Spring- and fall-calving records from a 5-yr period (2005 through 2009) collected at the University of Arkansas, Livestock and Forestry Research Station (Batesville) and the Department of Animal Science Savoy Research Unit (Savoy, AR) were used. All cows were multiparous, predominantly Angus, and naturally bred. During this period, 2,210 calves were born over a cumulative 1,547 d. Local weather station BARO and MAX_T and MIN_T data were obtained from the Southern Regional Climate Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. The combined calving record and climate variables were used to determine differences in BARO, MAX_T, and MIN_T on d 0 (d of calving) and -1, -2, or -3 d, respectively, before calving occurred (CALFD) or did not occur (NOCALFD). Location and season also were included in the model. For fall-calving cows, BARO on d 0 and -1, -2, or -3 was not different between CALFD and NOCALFD (P > 0.10). For spring-calving cows, BARO on d 0, -1, -2, and -3 was greater (P < 0.05) for CALFD compared with NOCALFD. The MAX_T was greater on d -1 (24.4 vs. 22.9°C) and -3 (24.8 vs. 23.4°C) for CALFD in the fall compared with NOCALFD (P < 0.05). No differences were detected in the fall for MAX_T on d 0 or -2 (P > 0.10). In the spring, a decreased MAX_T was associated with CALFD. Maximum environmental temperatures on d 0 (14.7 vs. 16.0°C), -1 (14.4 vs. 16.0°C), and -3 (14.0 vs. 15.7°C) were less for CALFD compared with NOCALFD (P < 0.05). No difference was detected on d -2 (P > 0.10). For fall, MIN_T was greater on d -1 (12.8 vs. 11.3°C), -2 (13.0 vs. 11.4°C), and -3 (13.1 vs. 11.7°C) for CALFD compared with NOCALFD (P < 0.05). In spring, MIN_T for d 0 (2.6 vs. 3.9°C), -1 (2.5 vs. 3.7°C), -2 (2.1 vs. 3.7°C), and -3 (1.8 vs. 3.8°C) were lesser (P < 0.05) for CALFD vs. NOCALFD. These data indicate that for spring-calving cows, a greater BARO and decreased MAX_T and MIN_T were associated with CALFD, whereas for fall-calving cows, an increase in MAX_T and MIN_T was associated with CALFD. Therefore, monitoring weather conditions may assist producers in preparing for the obstetric assistance of beef cattle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weather patterns, such as changes in atmospheric pressure and temperature, affect timing of birth in cattle.
“Weather patterns, such as changes in atmospheric pressure and temperature, have been reported to affect timing of birth in cattle [15], which is consistent with comparable reports for humans [1–3].”
From Lunar Cycle Influences Spontaneous Delivery in Cows (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Nutrient requirements of beef cattle
Board on Agriculture (1963) · Cited by 3,662 · see citing works
Davidson, A. P., & Stabenfeldt, G. H. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-55227-1.00038-7 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
The Cooperative Extension Service
Pederson, H. C., & Sanders, H. C. (1966) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1236888 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Bellows, R. A., Patterson, D. J., Burfening, P. J., et al. (1987) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/0093-691x(87)90274-3 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Body temperature and endocrine interactions before and after calving in beef cows.
Lammoglia-Villagómez, M. Á., Bellows, R. A., Short, R. E., Bellows, S. E., Bighorn, E. G., Stevenson, J. S., & Randel, R. D. (1997) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1997.7592526x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Colburn, D., Deutscher, G. H., Nielsen, M. K., et al. (1997) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1997.7561452x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Premature Rupture of the Fetal Membranes, the Phases of the Moon and Barometer Readings
Trap, R., Helm, P., Lidegaard, Ø., & Helm, E. (2010) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000293490 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Stevenson, J. S. (1989) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79414-5 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A note on the relationship between barometric pressure and calving incidence
Dvorak, R. A. (1978) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/0378-4320(78)90003-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Jaeger, J. R., Olson, K. C., DelCurto, T., et al. (2008) · The Professional Animal Scientist · doi:10.1532/s1080-7446(15)30847-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Influence of meteorological events on obstetrical data in cattle and swine
Dickie, M. B., Sabo, P., & Schaller, A. (1994) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1020041 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
HARRIS, D. J. (1985) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1985.tb14911.x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lunar Cycle Influences Spontaneous Delivery in Cows
Yonezawa, T., Uchida, M., Tomioka, M., & Matsuki, N. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161735 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Troxel, T. R., & Gadberry, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas System (US)
- Department of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Little Rock 72204
- Corresponding author
- Troxel, T. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1583-1588
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1970182547
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
- Keywords
- atmospheric pressure, ambient temperature, childbirth, calving, beef cows, spring calving, fall calving, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, Angus cattle, multiparous cows
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Computer Simulation, Environment, Female, Models, Biological, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Seasons, Temperature, Parturition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review