Determination of value of bovine respiratory disease control using a remote early disease identification system compared with conventional methods of metaphylaxis and visual observations1
Open accessAbstract
Mitigation of the deleterious effects of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is an important issue in the cattle industry. Conventional management of calves at high risk for BRD often includes mass treatment with antimicrobials at arrival followed by visual observation for individual clinical cases. These methods have proven effective; however, control program efficacy is influenced by the accuracy of visual observation. A remote early disease identification (REDI) system has been described that monitors cattle behavior to identify potential BRD cases. The objective of this research was to compare health and performance outcomes using either traditional BRD control (visual observation and metaphylaxis) or REDI during a 60-d postarrival phase in high-risk beef calves. The randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in 8 replicates at 3 different facilities over a 19-mo period. In each replicate, a single load of calves was randomly allocated to receive either conventional management (CONV; total = 8) or REDI (total = 8) as the method for BRD control. Cattle were monitored with each diagnostic method for the first 30 d on feed and performance variables were collected until approximately 60 d after arrival. Statistical differences ( 0.10) in risk of BRD treatment and REDI calves were not administered antimicrobials at arrival; therefore, REDI calves had a lower ( < 0.01) average number of doses of antimicrobials/calf (0.75 ± 0.1 doses) compared with CONV calves (1.67 ± 0.1 d…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The REDI system proved more accurate than manual checks by barn staff for identifying clinical cases.
“With no gold standard for identifying clinical cases, the REDI system proved more accurate than manual checks by barn staff.”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [231]
Cites
Wolfger, B., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Barkema, H. W., Pajor, E. A., Levy, M., & Orsel, K. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2013-8030 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Theurer, M. E., White, B. J., Larson, R. L., Holstein, K. K., & Amrine, D. E. (2014) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.245.11.1279 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bovine Respiratory Disease Diagnosis
Buczinski, S., & Pardon, B. (2020) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“The remote early disease identification (REDI) system, coupled with a Bayesian latent class model [231,232], utilized real-time animal position data to monitor feedlot calves.”
MethodUsing advanced technologies to quantify beef cattle behavior1
Richeson, J. T., Lawrence, T. E., & White, B. J. (2018) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.1093/tas/txy004 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- White, B. J., Amrine, D. E., & Goehl, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- White, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4115-4122
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2308320745
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- bovine respiratory disease, metaphylaxis, beef calves, antimicrobial use reduction, visual observation, calf health, average daily gain, morbidity, mortality risk, early diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Telemetry, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review