Cited by 176Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization

Assessing Minimum Amounts and Form of Roughages in Ruminant Diets: Roughage Value Index System

Sudweeks, E. M., Ely, L. O., Mertens, D. R., Sisk, L. R.·1981·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Ruminants require adequate amounts of coarse-textured feeds to avoid metabolic disorders and, in the case of dairy cows, reduced milk fat production. Coarse-textured feeds help to maintain both proper muscle tone in the digestive system and proper rumen pH, both of which contribute to productivity and health. Texture of feeds is quantitatively reflected in the chewing activity of ruminants, and chewing stimulates saliva secretion. Saliva contains bicarbonates and other buffers that alter rumen environment and help avert disorders. Because chewing time reflects feed texture, a series of experiments were conducted in which feed intake, chewing time and milk and fat production were measured. Roughage value indexes (RVI) were partitioned for feed ingredients from regression equations. In addition, an equation was developed that predicts RVI from sieving and chemical data: RVI = 10.86 + PS (21.59) − DMI (1.91) + NDF (.541), where RVI is minutes/kilogram, PS is particle size in mean diameter, DMI is dry matter intake in kilograms and NDF is neutral detergent fiber percentage. The minimum RVI for the production of 3.5% fat milk was determined. By coupling an RVI requirement of 31 min/kg with feed RVI, one can formulate, by computer, diets for lactating cows that not only are nutritionally adequate, but also are adequate in roughage value, and thus avert metabolic disorders. The RVI procedure is ready for field testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas1981.5351406x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The influence of length of cut of ensiled maize on total-tract digestibility of NDF is equivocal in the literature, with reports of similar or increased NDF digestibility with longer length of cut.

    “The influence of LOC of ensiled maize on the total-tract digestibility of NDF is equivocal in the literature, with reports of similar 62,73 -78 or increased 31,79,80 NDF digestibility, with longer LOC of ensiled maize.”
  • The influence of length of cut of ensiled maize on total-tract digestibility of NDF is equivocal in the literature, with reports of similar or increased NDF digestibility with longer length of cut.

    “The influence of LOC of ensiled maize on the total-tract digestibility of NDF is equivocal in the literature, with reports of similar 62,73 -78 or increased 31,79,80 NDF digestibility, with longer LOC of ensiled maize.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sudweeks, E. M., Ely, L. O., Mertens, D. R., & Sisk, L. R.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1981-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
1406-1411
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W134047165
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Keywords
ruminant diets, dairy cattle, chewing time, feed texture, rumen pH, rumen disorders, milk fat production, neutral detergent fiber, particle size, dry matter intake, diet formulation, lactating dairy cows

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review