Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets

Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L., Koong, L. J.·1982·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

A biochemical model coupled with an iterative nonlinear least-squares program was used to estimate stoichiometric parameters for fermentation of soluble carbohydrate, starch, hemicellulose, cellulose and protein in the rumen. Fermentation parameters were deduced for two sets of literature data, on (1) a roughage group of 60 diets fed to 137 animals and (2) a concentrate group of 48 diets fed to 374 animals. Soluble carbohydrate and starch fermentation parameters were much different for the roughage and concentrate groups. Differences were also noted in fermentation parameters for hemicellulose and cellulose. Model sensitivity to imposed changes of iteratively deduced parameters supported the conclusion that the estimated values are unique for all substrates except protein. In vitro estimates of isolated substrate fermentation from the literature agreed favorably with those indicated for hemicellulose. Cellulose fermentation was estimated to yield an acetate to propionate ratio of 7.8 to 13.1:1. This was higher than estimates in the literature of 1.3 to 3.6:1. Predicted fermentation patterns were within the range of normal biological variation noted for actual patterns. Systematic error components were identified as lignin plus ash as a percentage of feed dry matter and percentage roughage in the diet for the roughage and concentrate groups, respectively. Significant bias remained only in the roughage group for acetate and butyrate. Predicted vs observed acetate, propionate and butyrate production, for diets where comparison data were available, had slopes (correlation coefficients) of .84 (.98), 1.03 (.97) and .94 (.98), respectively. By this method, products of fermentation were estimated with nearly the same accuracy with which they can be measured experimentally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas1982.552411x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L., & Koong, L. J.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1982-08-01
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W2413827119
Cited by
215
References
0
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1982.552411x
The paper
Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L., & Koong, L. J. (1982). Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.552411x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.