The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets
Abstract
A biochemical model coupled with an iterative nonlinear least-squares program was used to estimate stoichiometric parameters for fermentation of soluble carbohydrate, starch, hemicellulose, cellulose and protein in the rumen. Fermentation parameters were deduced for two sets of literature data, on (1) a roughage group of 60 diets fed to 137 animals and (2) a concentrate group of 48 diets fed to 374 animals. Soluble carbohydrate and starch fermentation parameters were much different for the roughage and concentrate groups. Differences were also noted in fermentation parameters for hemicellulose and cellulose. Model sensitivity to imposed changes of iteratively deduced parameters supported the conclusion that the estimated values are unique for all substrates except protein. In vitro estimates of isolated substrate fermentation from the literature agreed favorably with those indicated for hemicellulose. Cellulose fermentation was estimated to yield an acetate to propionate ratio of 7.8 to 13.1:1. This was higher than estimates in the literature of 1.3 to 3.6:1. Predicted fermentation patterns were within the range of normal biological variation noted for actual patterns. Systematic error components were identified as lignin plus ash as a percentage of feed dry matter and percentage roughage in the diet for the roughage and concentrate groups, respectively. Significant bias remained only in the roughage group for acetate and butyrate. Predicted vs observed acetate, propionate and butyrate production, for diets where comparison data were available, had slopes (correlation coefficients) of .84 (.98), 1.03 (.97) and .94 (.98), respectively. By this method, products of fermentation were estimated with nearly the same accuracy with which they can be measured experimentally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Knapp, J. R., Laur, G. L., Vadas, P. A., Weiss, W. P., & Tricarico, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7234 · Cited by 1,002
Janssen, P. H. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 · Cited by 836
Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production?
Grainger, C., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.021 · Cited by 447
Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism
Baldwin, R. L., & Donovan, K. C. (1998) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1959-5_21 · Cited by 345
Self-citationAspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle
ELLIS, J. L., DIJKSTRA, J., KEBREAB, E., BANNINK, A., ODONGO, N. E., McBRIDE, B. W., & FRANCE, J. (2008) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859608007752 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L., & Koong, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-08-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-421
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2413827119
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1982.552411x
- The paper
- Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L., & Koong, L. J. (1982). Estimation of Stoichiometric Parameters for Rumen Fermentation of Roughage and Concentrate Diets. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.552411x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.