Cited by 76Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Body Composition on Fasting Heat Production in Pigs1

Tess, M. W., Dickerson, G. E., Nienaber, J. A., Ferrell, C. L.·1984·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Ten sets of three litter mate barrows from each of three genetic stocks, Beltsville Highfat (HF) and Lowfat (LF) Duroc-Yorkshire composites and a Hampshire X Large White cross (CX), were used to investigate effects of body composition on fasting heat production (FHP). Pigs from each set were fasted for 24 h at 10, 17 or 24 wk of age before measuring respiratory exchange for 24 h in an open-circuit calorimeter. Average heat production during night hours (8 h) in the calorimeter was used to estimate FHP. Each pig was then slaughtered and dissected into three fractions: carcass, head and feet, viscera and blood. Each fraction was frozen, ground, sampled and analyzed for protein, fat, water and ash. Correlations within ages of FHP with calorimeter live weight (CLWT) were lower than with total weight of lean, protein or water, but near zero with fat at all ages. Coefficients of determination (R2) for linear and nonlinear predictors of FHP from lean were: .58, .89 and .91 at 10, 17 and 24 wk, respectively, but from CLWT were: .52, .74 and .82, respectively. Negative partial regressions of FHP on fat improved R2 slightly at 10 and 17 wk but not at 24 wk, suggesting that fatter pigs were better insulated. Viscera and blood influenced FHP more than carcass or head and feet. Estimated exponents relating lean mass to FHP ranged from .79 to .86 and FHP (kcal/d) = (86 +/- 20) X lean kg X 84 (+/- X 06) at 24 wk. There was some evidence of stock differences in FHP independent of body composition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas1984.58199x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tess, M. W., Dickerson, G. E., Nienaber, J. A., & Ferrell, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1984-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
99-110
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W198367683
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
fasting heat production, body composition, pigs, lean body mass, fat mass, pulmonary gas exchange, calorimetry, body insulation, carcass composition, barrows
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Aging, Animals, Body Composition, Body Temperature Regulation, Body Weight, Calorimetry, Energy Metabolism, Fasting, Male, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review