The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symposium on “Indices to Measure Animal Well-Being”
Abstract
Stereotypies are repetitive actions that are fixed in form and orientation and serve no obvious purpose. Their occurrence in farm animals submitted to intensive husbandry has been interpreted to indicate inadequate environmental design or welfare. Over recent years, detailed descriptive studies have led to a better understanding of the organization and development of stereotypies, particularly in pregnant sows housed in tether stalls. Stereotyped behaviors appear to emerge from elements of initial defensive reactions of animals to their environment. They develop via a progressive narrowing of the behavioral repertoire, until only self-directed behaviors are displayed. Pharmacological studies suggest that performance of stereotyped behavior depends on the brain dopamine systems that are involved in selection and initiation of motor movements. However, generalization of these data to natural stereotypies is doubtful. Recent evidence favors an involvement of brain opioid peptides in stereotyped behavior of sows, although the exact mechanisms remain unknown. Stereotypies are typically observed in situations of conflict or frustration. They have been claimed to have an adaptive function, either by providing self-generated sensory stimulation to compensate for the lack of environmental stimulation, or by allowing animals to discharge their tension or anxiety. However, there is little evidence in favor of either interpretation. On the basis of present knowledge, it is proposed that stereotyped activities gain strength because of the positive feedback effect of sensory stimulation on their underlying control systems, which leads to a progressive sensitization of these neural systems. Stereotypies would then be simply the outward expression of an activation of lower brain structures controlling motor behavior which occurs in the absence of normal inhibitory control by higher nervous functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
β-Endorphin and Adrenocorticotropin Are Selected Concomitantly by the Pituitary Gland
Guillemin, R., Vargo, T., Rossier, J., Minick, S., Ling, N., Rivier, C., Vale, W., & Bloom, F. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.197601 · Cited by 1,419
The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior
Falk, J. L. (1971) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(71)90209-5 · Cited by 811
Organization of endogenous opiate and nonopiate pain control systems
Watkins, L. R., & Mayer, D. J. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6281891 · Cited by 791
Stress in Farm Animals: A Need for Reevaluation
Dantzer, R., & Mormède, P. (1983) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1983.5716 · Cited by 490
Self-citationA re-evaluation of the concept of ‘non-specificity’ in stress theory
Mason, J. W. (1971) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(71)90028-8 · Cited by 478
Catecholamines and Behavior · 1
(1975) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3135-3 · Cited by 262
Selective disruption of displacement behaviour by lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system
Robbins, T. W., & Koob, G. F. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/285409a0 · Cited by 257
Arousal: Its genesis and manifestation as response rate.
Killeen, P. R., Hanson, S. J., & Osborne, S. R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.85.6.571 · Cited by 240
Tail Pinch Induces Eating in Sated Rats Which Appears to Depend on Nigrostriatal Dopamine
Antelman, S. M., & Szechtman, H. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154024 · Cited by 233
The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls
Fraser, D. (1975) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s0003356100030415 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Stereotypies: a critical review
Mason, G. J. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80640-2 · Cited by 1,295
Animal welfare: concepts and measurement2
Broom, D. M. (1991) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1991.69104167x · Cited by 1,095
Fish welfare: Current issues in aquaculture
Ashley, P. J. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.09.001 · Cited by 1,074
From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare
Dawkins, M. S. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00077104 · Cited by 1,014
Fear and Fearfulness in Animals
Boissy, A. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418981 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Dantzer, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-06-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1776-1786
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1601080250
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symposium on “Indices to Measure Animal Well-Being”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1986.6261776x
- The paper
- Dantzer, R. (1986). Symposium on “Indices to Measure Animal Well-Being”. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.6261776x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.