The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare
Abstract
To study animal welfare empirically we need an objective basis for deciding when an animal is suffering. Suffering includes a wide range ofunpleasant emotional states such as fear, boredom, pain, and hunger. Suffering has evolved as a mechanism for avoiding sources ofdanger and threats to fitness. Captive animals often suffer in situations in which they are prevented from doing something that they are highly motivated to do. The “price” an animal is prepared to pay to attain or to escape a situation is an index ofhow the animal “feels” about that situation. Withholding conditions or commodities for which an animal shows “inelastic demand” (i.e., for which it continues to work despite increasing costs) is very likely to cause suffering. In designing environments for animals in zoos, farms, and laboratories, priority should be given to features for which animals show inelastic demand. The care ofanimals can thereby be based on an objective, animal-centered assessment of their needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00076512 · Cited by 8,743
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Gray, J. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00013066 · Cited by 4,477
Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action
Libet, B. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00044903 · Cited by 2,623
Behaviour and the Concept of Preference
Sen, A. (1973) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2552796 · Cited by 844
APPETITES AND AVERSIONS AS CONSTITUENTS OF INSTINCTS
CRAIG, W. (1918) · The Biological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1536346 · Cited by 702
Cited by
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments
Newberry, R. C. (1995) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-z · Cited by 1,112
Animal welfare: concepts and measurement2
Broom, D. M. (1991) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1991.69104167x · Cited by 1,095
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085
Mammalian Play: Training for the Unexpected
Spinka, M., Newberry, R. C., & Bekoff, M. (2001) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/393866 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawkins, M. S.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2126320339
- Cited by
- 1,014
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 79.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0140525x00077104
- The paper
- Dawkins, M. S. (1990). From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00077104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.