Cited by 21Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Effect of the inoculation of sugarcane silage with Lactobacillus hilgardii and Lactobacillus buchneri on feeding behavior and milk yield of dairy cows1

Santos, W. P., Ávila, C. L. S., Pereira, M. N., Schwan, R. F., Lopes, N. M., Pinto, J. C.·2017·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Despite its low NDF digestibility, sugarcane is an option for feeding dairy cattle in tropical regions. We evaluated the effect of sugarcane silages inoculated with CCMA 0170 (LH; an epiphytic bacteria isolated from sugarcane) or with NCIMB 40788 (LB; a commercial strain isolated from temperate grasses) on dairy cow performance and feeding behavior. The microbial inoculums were previously grown in the laboratory to obtain 5 log cfu/g of fresh forage. Nine tons of each inoculated silage and a noninoculated control silage (CON) were harvested from the same field and stored for at least 35 d in experimental 20 × 2.1 × 0.4 m bunker silos. Fifteen Holstein cows in late lactation (336 ± 175 days in milk at the start of the experiment) received the treatments in five 3 × 3 Latin squares with 21-d periods. The diets contained 20% of DM of sugarcane silage and 41% of DM of corn silage. Milk yield was increased from 18.0 kg/d for CON to18.8 kg/d for LH, but LB did not elicit a detectable increase in milk yield (18.1 kg/d). The daily yields of fat, protein, lactose, and total solids were increased by LH. Daily DMI and total tract apparent digestibility of nutrients did not differ among treatments. Both inoculated silages reduced acetate and increased butyrate proportions in ruminal VFA, but only LH silage reduced the acetate to propionate ratio (3.0 vs 3.3). First meal duration was shorter for CON compared to LH and LB. The proportion of daily intake between 0700 and 1300 h tended to be increased, and the proportion between 1900 and 0700 h was reduced by LH. The inoculation of sugarcane silage with affected rumen fermentation profile and feeding behavior of late lactation dairy cows, increasing the yield of milk solids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas2017.1526

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 21

Authors
Santos, W. P., Ávila, C. L. S., Pereira, M. N., Schwan, R. F., Lopes, N. M., & Pinto, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
  • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Lavras, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil
Corresponding author
Pereira, M. N.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2017-10-01
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
4613-4622
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W2943393055
Cited by
21
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FAPEMIG
  • CNPq
  • Lallemand Animal Nutrition
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
sugarcane silage, Lactobacillus hilgardii, Lactobacillus buchneri, silage inoculation, dairy cattle, milk yield, feeding behavior, rumen fermentation, volatile fatty acids, acetate to propionate ratio, milk solids, late lactation, tropical forages
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Zea mays, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fermentation, Lactation, Lactobacillus, Milk, Rumen, Silage, Saccharum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review