Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in action
Open accessAbstract
Section A: Problems and practices. 1. Introduction. 2. Classroom Discourse and Teaching. 3. Classroom Discourse and Learning. Section B Interventions. 4. Why Study Classroom Discourse? 5. Features of Classroom Discourse. 6. Traditional Approaches to Studying Classroom Discourse. 7. Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Classroom Discourse. Section C Theory. 8. Enhancing Understandings of Classroom Discourse. 9. Classroom Interactional Competence. 10. Summary and Conclusions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structured interaction through the IRF pattern can help maintain students' attention and encourage participation in classroom communication.
“Walsh (2011) argues that structured interaction through the IRF pattern can help maintain students' attention and encourage participation in classroom communication.”
From Oral Interaction in English Classroom Using IRF Pattern between Teacher-Students at SMK Imelda Medan (2026) · cites this paper as Walsh (2011)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghiasvand, F., & PhD Candidate of Applied Linguistics, A. T. U. (2022) · Language Related Research · doi:10.52547/lrr.13.3.17 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Oral Interaction in English Classroom Using IRF Pattern between Teacher-Students at SMK Imelda Medan
Siregar, R. G. J., & Gultom, J. J. (2026) · TRANSFORM: Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.24114/tj.v15i2.75637
- Authors
- Walsh, S.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walsh, Steve
- ORCID
- Walsh, Steve
- Venue
- Newcastle University
- Publisher
- Newcastle University
- Published
- 2011-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W607193286
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 134.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Keywords
- classroom discourse, classroom interaction, interactional competence, language in action, classroom teaching, classroom learning, discourse analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
