The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Islands in between : prehistory of the northeastern Indonesian archipelago
Abstract
The northeastern Indonesian archipelago occupies a strategic location against the southwestern rim of the Pacific. It has been suggested that it served as a 'stepping stone' region for the migrations of people from Asia to Australia and Oceania in prehistory. Nevertheless, only limited archaeological research has been conducted in this area to date. Recently, further archaeological survey and excavation has been carried out here by me, especially in the Talaud (North Sulawesi) and Sula Islands (North Moluccas), in order to generate new data. This thesis presents the results of that recent research. The excavated archaeological materials demonstrate that humans have occupied this region since Late Pleistocene, at least 30,000 years ago. The cultural materials excavated from younger sites witness the spread of Austronesian-speaking agricultural peoples, probably from Taiwan into the Pacific about 4,000 years ago, as also supported by linguistic reconstruction. As these new data are incorporated into the available corpus of research information, the cultural processes that took place in northeastern Indonesia can be reconstructed in the wider regional context of Island Southeast Asia and Western Melanesia. A firmer cultural sequence for this area can now be established. In this thesis, a model for initial Pleistocene human colonization in Wallacea and Oceania is suggested. Furthermore, an alternative explanation for the dispersal of the Austronesian-speaking populations is also proposed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such preservation issues likely explain why certain sites, such as Liang Sarru, lack a vertebrate archaeological record.
“Such preservation issues likely explain why certain sites, such as Liang Sarru in the Talauds (Supplementary Online Material [SOM] Fig. S1), lack a vertebrate archaeological record (Tanudirjo, 2001;Ono et al., 2009).”
From Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul (2018) · cites this paper as Tanudirjo, 2001
Fatiba Cave on Sanana Island records earliest occupation at 16.2e17.2ka cal BP (14200 ± 150 ANU-10502), calibrated here using OxCal 4.3.2 and the Marine 13 calibration curve.
“The oldest of these, Fatiba Cave (SOM Fig. S1), records earliest occupation at 16.2e17.2ka cal BP (14200 ± 150 ANU-10502; Tanudirjo, 2001), calibrated here using OxCal 4.3.2(Ramsey, 2009) and the Marine 13 calibration curve (Reimer et al., 2013).”
From Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul (2018) · cites this paper as Tanudirjo, 2001
In the Sula group just to the east, three sites have been excavated and produced radiocarbon dates for occupation on Sanana Island.
“in the Sula group just to the east, three sites have been excavated and produced radiocarbon dates for occupation on Sanana Island (Tanudirjo, 2001).”
From Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul (2018) · cites this paper as Tanudirjo, 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul
Kealy, S., Louys, J., & O'Connor, S. (2018) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.003 · Cited by 169
Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
Bird, M. I., Condie, S. A., O’Connor, S., O’Grady, D., Reepmeyer, C., Ulm, S., Zega, M., Saltré, F., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanudirjo, D. A.
- Venue
- The Australian National University
- Publisher
- The Australian National University
- Published
- 2001
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review