The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtual entanglement and reconciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continuous variables
Open accessAbstract
We discuss quantum key distribution protocols using quantum continuous variables. We show that such protocols can be made secure against individual gaussian attacks regardless the transmission of the optical line between Alice and Bob. %while other ones require that the line transmission is larger than 50%. This is achieved by reversing the reconciliation procedure subsequent to the quantum transmission, that is, using Bob's instead of Alice's data to build the key. Although squeezing or entanglement may be helpful to improve the resistance to noise, they are not required for the protocols to remain secure with high losses. Therefore, these protocols can be implemented very simply by transmitting coherent states and performing homodyne detection. Here, we show that entanglement nevertheless plays a crucial role in the security analysis of coherent state protocols. Every cryptographic protocol based on displaced gaussian states turns out to be equivalent to an entanglement-based protocol, even though no entanglement is actually present. This equivalence even holds in the absence of squeezing, for coherent state protocols. This ``virtual'' entanglement is important to assess the security of these protocols as it provides an upper bound on the mutual information between Alice and Bob if they had used entanglement. The resulting security criteria are compared to the separability criterion for bipartite gaussian variables. It appears that the security thresholds are well within the entanglement region. This supports the idea that coherent state quantum cryptography may be unconditionally secure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Cited by
Unconditional Optimality of Gaussian Attacks against Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution
García-Patrón, R., & Cerf, N. J. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.190503 · Cited by 573
Self-citationQuantum key distribution over25kmwith an all-fiber continuous-variable system
Lodewyck, J., Bloch, M., García-Patrón, R., Fossier, S., Karpov, E., Diamanti, E., Debuisschert, T., Cerf, N. J., Tualle-Brouri, R., McLaughlin, S. W., et al. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042305 · Cited by 543
Self-citationNon-Gaussian Statistics from Individual Pulses of Squeezed Light
Wenger, J., Tualle-Brouri, R., & Grangier, P. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.153601 · Cited by 396
Self-citationContinuous-variable quantum cryptography using two-way quantum communication
Pirandola, S., Mancini, S., Lloyd, S., & Braunstein, S. L. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1018 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosshans, F., Cerf, N. J., Wenger, J., Tualle-Brouri, R., & Grangier, P.
- Venue
- Quantum Information and Computation
- Publisher
- Rinton Press
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- special
- Pages
- 535-552
- ISSN
- 1533-7146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164685126
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtual entanglement and reconciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continuous variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26421/qic3.s-6
- The paper
- Grosshans, F., Cerf, N. J., Wenger, J., Tualle-Brouri, R., & Grangier, P. (2003). Virtual entanglement and reconciliation protocols for quantum cryptography with continuous variables. Quantum Information and Computation. https://doi.org/10.26421/qic3.s-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.