An exact effective two-qubit gate in a chain of three spins
Open accessAbstract
We show that an effective two-qubit gate can be obtained from the free evolution of three spins in a chain with nearest neighbor XY coupling, without local manipulations. This gate acts on the two remote spins and leaves the mediating spin unchanged. It can be used to perfectly transfer an arbitrary quantum state from the first spin to the last spin or to simultaneously communicate one classical bit in each direction. One ebit can be generated in half of the time for state transfer. For longer spin chains, we present methods to create or transfer entanglement between the two end spins in half of the time required for quantum state transfer, given tunable coupling strength and local magnetic field. We also examine imperfect state transfer through a homogeneous XY chain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The condition in Eq. (5) is not only sufficient but also necessary for perfect state transfer in mirror symmetric chains.
“It has been shown [10] that the condition in Eq. (5) is not only sufficient but also necessary for perfect state transfer in mirror symmetric chains.”
From Quantum speed limit for perfect state transfer in one dimension (2006) · cites this paper as [10]
There are many possible solutions for constructing spin chains that allow perfect state transfer, and searching for them is in general an inverse eigenvalue problem.
“Moreover, it has also been pointed out [10] that there are many possible solutions for constructing spin chains which allow perfect state transfer, and the searching for the solutions is in general an inverse eigenvalue problem.”
From Quantum speed limit for perfect state transfer in one dimension (2006) · cites this paper as [10]
For a mirror-symmetric Hamiltonian, < ̄x|e_k> = (-1)^k <x|e_k>, and hence |< ̄x|U(τ)|x>| = 1 if Eq. (5) holds.
“Provided that the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) or Eq. (3) is mirror symmetrical, i.e. λ j = λ ¯ j and ω j = ω N -j , one can show [10] that 〈 ¯ x | e k 〉 = ( -1) k 〈 x | e k 〉 , and hence |〈 ¯ x | U ( τ ) | x 〉| = 1 if”
From Quantum speed limit for perfect state transfer in one dimension (2006) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433 · see citing works
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
Owen, D. B., Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266136 · Cited by 16,379 · see citing works
Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways
Dür, W., Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.062314 · Cited by 3,384 · see citing works
Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain
Bose, S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.207901 · Cited by 1,407 · see citing works
Self-citationPerfect State Transfer in Quantum Spin Networks
Christandl, M., Datta, N., Ekert, A., & Landahl, A. J. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.187902 · Cited by 1,179 · see citing works
Quantum Data HidingPreprint
Divincenzo, D. P., Leung, D., & Terhal, B. M. (2001) · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationKhaneja, N., Glaser, S. J., & Brockett, R. W. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032301 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Entanglement dynamics and quantum-state transport in spin chains
Subrahmanyam, V. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.034304 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Quantum Computing with an Always-On Heisenberg Interaction
Benjamin, S. C., & Bose, S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.247901 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationSeparable States Can Be Used To Distribute Entanglement
Cubitt, T. S., Verstraete, F., Dür, W., & Cirac, J. I. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.037902 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Efficient Refocusing of One-Spin and Two-Spin Interactions for NMR Quantum Computation
Jones, J. A., & Knill, E. H. (1999) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1006/jmre.1999.1890 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Efficient implementation of coupled logic gates for quantum computation
Leung, D., Chuang, I. L., Yamaguchi, F., & Yamamoto, Y. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042310 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationFinding cliques by quantum adiabatic evolution
Childs, A. M., Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2002) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic2.3-1 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distributed Quantum Computation via Optical Fibers
Serafini, A., Mancini, S., & Bose, S. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010503 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Self-citationConclusive and arbitrarily perfect quantum-state transfer using parallel spin-chain channels
Burgarth, D. K., & Bose, S. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.052315 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum speed limit for perfect state transfer in one dimension
Yung, M.-H. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.030303 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient generation of graph states for quantum computation
Clark, S. R., Alves, C. M., & Jaksch, D. (2005) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/124 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Automatic spin-chain learning to explore the quantum speed limit
Zhang, X., Cui, Z.-W., Wang, X., & Yung, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.052333 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum cloning in spin networks
Chiara, G. D., Fazio, R., Macchiavello, C., Montangero, S., & Palma, G. M. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.062308 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Quantum-state transfer in imperfect artificial spin networks
Paternostro, M., Palma, G. M., Kim, M. S., & Falci, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042311 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Robust multipartite entanglement generation via a collision model
Çakmak, B., Campbell, S., Vacchini, B., Müstecaplıoğlu, Ö. E., & Paternostro, M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012319 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Quantum communication through a spin ring with twisted boundary conditions
Bose, S., Jin, B.-Q., & Korepin, V. E. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022345 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationCloning transformations in spin networks without external control
Chiara, G. D., Fazio, R., Macchiavello, C., Montangero, S., & Palma, G. M. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.012328 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Quantum Liang Information Flow as Causation Quantifier
Yi, B., & Bose, S. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.020501 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationWeaving light-matter qubits into a one way quantum computer
Angelakis, D. G., & Kay, A. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023012 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Optimal quantum cloning via spin networks
Chen, Q., Cheng, J., Wang, K.-L., & Du, J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.034303 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Entanglement purification without controlled-NOT gates by using the natural dynamics of spin chains
Maruyama, K., & Nori, F. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.022312 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Dai, L., Feng, Y. P., & Kwek, L. C. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/43/3/035302 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Spin star as a switch for quantum networks
Yung, M. (2011) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/13/135504 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum communication via a continuously monitored dual spin chain
Shizume, K., Jacobs, K. A., Burgarth, D. K., & Bose, S. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.062328 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationRepresenting multiqubit unitary evolutions via Stokes tensors
Altafini, C. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.032331 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Mediated gates between spin qubits
Fei, J., Zhou, D., Shim, Y.-P., Oh, S., Hu, X., & Friesen, M. G. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.062328 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Koniorczyk, M., Rapčan, P., & Bužek, V. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022321 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Dobrzyniecki, J., & Tomza, M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.052618 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Li, Y., Zhi, S., & Changpu, S. (2007) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/48/3/012 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Role of interference in quantum state transfer through spin chains
Lyakhov, A. O., Braun, D., & Bruder, C. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.022321 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Parity-dependent state transfer for direct entanglement generation
Roy, F., Romeiro, J. H., Koch, L., Tsitsilin, I., Schirk, J., Glaser, N. J., Bruckmoser, N., Singh, M., Haslbeck, F. X., Huber, G. B. P., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57818-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Optimal 1→M universal quantum cloning via spin networks
Zhang, J., Chen, Q., & Wan, S. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.034302 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Entanglement creation and distribution on a graph of exchange-coupled qutrits
Hadley, C., Serafini, A., & Bose, S. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052333 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationEffective nonlocal parity-dependent couplings in qubit chains
Nägele, M., Schweizer, C., Roy, F., & Filipp, S. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033166 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Arbitrarily perfect quantum communication using unmodulated spin chains, a collaborative approach
Vaucher, B., Burgarth, D. K., & Bose, S. (2005) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/023 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationGenerating a GHZ state in 2m-qubit spin network
Jafarizadeh, M. A., Sufiani, R., Taghavi, S. F., Barati, E., Eghbalifam, F., & Azimi, M. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/05/p05014 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Universal Sets of Quantum Information Processing Primitives and Their Optimal Use
Gruska, J. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11889342_24 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Implementation of positive-operator-value measurements for single spin qubit via Heisenberg model
Cheng, L., Xiao-Qiang, S., Shou, Z., & Yeon, K.-H. (2010) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/9/090311 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Implementation of the Fredkin gate with a three-qubit mixed-spin Heisenberg model
Fan, Q.-B. (2010) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-010-3209-9 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Many body effects and cluster state quantum computation in strongly interacting systems of photonsPreprint
Angelakis, D. G., Bose, S., Kay, A., & Santos, M. F. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0803.1665
Self-citationPhysical challenges of quantum computation
Yung, M. H. (2009) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Self-citationENTANGLEMENT FROM THE DYNAMICS OF AN IDEAL BOSE GAS IN A LATTICE
Bose, S. (2012) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979212430035
Self-citationNatural Dynamics of Spin Chains
Ronke, R. (2012) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Fluxon-controlled quantum computer
Fujii, T., Matsuo, S., & Hatakenaka, N. (2016) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749916500404
Entanglement and quantum information theory in the context of higher dimensional spin systems.
Hadley, C. (2008) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
- Authors
- Yung, M.-H., Leung, D. W., & Bose, S.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Quantum Information and Computation
- Publisher
- Rinton Press
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 174-185
- ISSN
- 1533-7146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1890558422
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Quantum Information and Computation (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
- Keywords
- two-qubit gates, spin chains, quantum state transfer, entanglement generation, EBIT, quantum communication, free evolution, nearest-neighbor coupling, local magnetic field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review