The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices
Abstract
We prove the security of the Bennett-Brassard (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol in the case where the source and detector are under the limited control of an adversary. Our proof applies when both the source and the detector have small basis-dependent flaws, as is typical in practical implementations of the protocol. We derive a general lower bound on the asymptotic key generation rate for weakly basis-dependent eavesdropping attacks, and also estimate the rate in some special cases: sources that emit weak coherent states with random phases, detectors with basis-dependent efficiency, and misaligned sources and detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · Cited by 8,299
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Fidelity for Mixed Quantum States
Jozsa, R. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 · Cited by 1,911
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Decoy state quantum key distribution
Lo, H.-K., Ma, X., & Chen, K. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230504 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationSecure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Self-citationDevice-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 · Cited by 1,537
Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors
Eisaman, M. D., Fan, J., Migdall, A., & Polyakov, S. V. (2011) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.3610677 · Cited by 1,358
Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., & Shields, A. J. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6 · Cited by 1,247
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottesman, D., Lo, H.-K., L\"utkenhaus, N., & Preskill, J.
- Venue
- Quantum Information and Computation
- Publisher
- Rinton Press
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 325-360
- ISSN
- 1533-7146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1585033983
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26421/qic4.5-1
- The paper
- Gottesman, D., Lo, H.-K., L\"utkenhaus, N., & Preskill, J. (2004). Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices. Quantum Information and Computation. https://doi.org/10.26421/qic4.5-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
