The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The implementation of the CNOT gate requires two NS gates and two additional 50:50 beam splitters acting on the target qubit.
“The implementation of the CNOT gate is similar to that of the CZ gate in that it requires two NS gates; however, two additional 50:50 BS are required acting on the target qubit [127], as shown in Fig. 5.”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [127]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1145/382780.382781 · DOI
- D. Mayers, 1996, Advances in Cryptology-Proc. Crypto ’96
- 10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 · DOI
- E. Biham, 2000, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’00)
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 · DOI · Paper page
- A. K. Ekert, 1994, J. Mod. Opt., 41, 2455, 10.1080/09500349414552301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2022 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1738173 · DOI
- 10.1143/JJAP.43.L1217 · DOI
- C. H. Bennett, 1984, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing
- D. Gottesman, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.120501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.217903 · DOI
- H.-K. Lo, 2004, Proceedings of 2004 IEEE ISIT
- X.-B. Wang, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 230503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
- G. Brassard, 1993, Advances in Cryptology, Eurocrypt ’93
- 10.1007/s00145-004-0142-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead
Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 · Cited by 2,467
Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution
Liao, S.-K., Cai, W.-Q., Liu, W.-Y., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Ren, J.-G., Yin, J., Shen, Q., Cao, Y., Li, Z.-P., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23655 · Cited by 1,821
Solid-state single-photon emitters
Aharonovich, I., Englund, D., & Toth, M. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.186 · Cited by 1,786
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., & Shields, A. J. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6 · Cited by 1,247
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication
Bhaskar, M. K., Riedinger, R., Machielse, B., Levonian, D. S., Nguyen, C. T., Knall, E. N., Park, H., Englund, D., Lončar, M., Sukachev, D. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2103-5 · Cited by 587
Development of quantum interconnects (QuICs) for next-generation information technologies
Awschalom, D., Berggren, K. K., Bernien, H., Bhave, S., Carr, L. D., Davids, P., Economou, S. E., Englund, D., Faraon, A., Fejer, M., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.017002 · Cited by 392
Air-to-ground quantum communication
Nauerth, S., Moll, F., Rau, M., Fuchs, C., Horwath, J., Frick, S., & Weinfurter, H. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.46 · Cited by 333
Direct and full-scale experimental verifications towards ground–satellite quantum key distribution
Wang, J.-Y., Yang, B., Liao, S.-K., Zhang, L., Shen, Q., Hu, X.-F., Wu, J.-C., Yang, S.-J., Jiang, H., Tang, Y.-L., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.89 · Cited by 309
Self-citationTwo-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing
Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., & Weihs, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00583-2 · Cited by 216
Recent advances on integrated quantum communications
Orieux, A., & Diamanti, E. (2016) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/18/8/083002 · Cited by 160
Chi, Y.-M., Qi, B., Zhu, W., Qian, L., Lo, H.-K., Youn, S.-H., Lvovsky, A. I., & Tian, L. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/1/013003 · Cited by 130
Self-citationRobust random number generation using steady-state emission of gain-switched laser diodes
Yuan, Z. L., Lucamarini, M., Dynes, J. F., Fröhlich, B., Plews, A., & Shields, A. J. (2014) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.4886761 · Cited by 129
Resolving photon numbers using a superconducting nanowire with impedance-matching taper
Zhu, D., Colangelo, M., Chen, C., Korzh, B. A., Wong, F. N. C., Shaw, M. D., & Berggren, K. K. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00985 · Cited by 103
Loss-tolerant measurement-device-independent quantum random number generation
Cao, Z., Zhou, H., & Ma, X. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125011 · Cited by 98
Self-citationLong-Distance Trust-Free Quantum Key Distribution
Piparo, N. L., & Razavi, M. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2014.2364129 · Cited by 41
A tuneable telecom wavelength entangled light emitting diode deployed in an installed fibre network
Xiang, Z.-H., Huwer, J., Skiba-Szymanska, J., Stevenson, R. M., Ellis, D. J. P., Farrer, I., Ward, M. B., Ritchie, D. A., & Shields, A. J. (2020) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-020-0390-7 · Cited by 29
Garapo, K., Mafu, M., & Petruccione, F. (2016) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/25/7/070303 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, H.-K., Ma, X., & Chen, K.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-06-16
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 23
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 2,138
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
