PreprintCited by 29Computational Drug Discovery MethodsResearch Data Management PracticesMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Open data and algorithms for open science in AI-driven molecular informatics

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102542 · Paper page

Abstract

Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the development of deep learning and artificial intelligence-based molecular informatics. There has been a growing interest in applying deep learning to several subfields, including the digital transformation of synthetic chemistry, extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature, and AI in natural product-based drug discovery. The application of AI to molecular informatics is still constrained by the fact that most of the data used for training and testing deep learning models are not available as FAIR and open data. As open science practices continue to grow in popularity, initiatives which support FAIR and open data, as well as open-source software, have emerged. It is becoming increasingly important for researchers in the field of molecular informatics to embrace open science and to submit data and software in open repositories. With the advent of open-source deep learning frameworks and cloud computing platforms, academic researchers are now able to deploy and test their own deep learning models with ease. With the development of new and faster hardware for deep learning and the increasing number of initiatives towards digital research data management infrastructures, as well as a culture promoting open data, open source, and open science, AI-driven molecular informatics will continue to grow. This review examines the current state of open data and open algorithms in molecular informatics, as well as ways in which they could be improved in future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-dgcm6-v2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Brinkhaus, H. O., Rajan, K., Schaub, J., Zielesny, A., & Steinbeck, C.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Westfälische Hochschule
Corresponding author
Steinbeck, Christoph
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Published
2023-01-10
Volume
79
Pages
102542-102542
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321274994
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1127)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
open data, open science, molecular informatics, FAIR data, open source software, deep learning, synthetic chemistry, chemical information extraction, natural product drug discovery, research data management, cloud computing
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open data and algorithms for open science in AI-driven molecular informatics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-dgcm6-v2
The paper
Brinkhaus, H. O., Rajan, K., Schaub, J., Zielesny, A., & Steinbeck, C. (2023). Open data and algorithms for open science in AI-driven molecular informatics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-dgcm6-v2