The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induced-Fit Docking Enables Accurate Free Energy Perturbation Calculations in Homology Models
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00371 · Paper page
Abstract
Homology models have been used for virtual screening and to understand the binding mode of a known active, however rare-ly have the models been shown to be of sufficient accuracy, comparable to crystal structures, to support free-energy perturba-tion (FEP) calculations. We demonstrate here that the use of an advanced induced-fit docking methodology reliably enables predictive FEP calculations on congeneric series across homology models ≥ 30% sequence identity. Further, we show that retrospective FEP calculations on a congeneric series of drug-like ligands is sufficient to discriminate between predicted binding modes. Results are presented for a total of 29 homology models for 14 protein targets, showing FEP results compa-rable to those obtained using experimentally determined crystal structures for 86% of homology models with template struc-ture sequence identities ranging from 30% to 50%. Implications for the use and validation of homology models in drug dis-covery projects are discussed, including the use of AlphaFold2 de novo structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, T., Zhu, K., Beautrait, A., Vendome, J., Borrelli, K., Abel, R., Friesner, R., & Miller, E.
- Affiliations
- Schrodinger (United States) (US)
- Schrodinger, Inc.
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Edward
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-04-14
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5710-5724
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293064187
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- homology model, induced fit docking, free energy perturbation, binding free energy, congeneric series, ligand binding modes, protein-ligand binding, drug discovery, model validation
- MeSH terms
- Ligands, Protein Binding, Retrospective Studies, Entropy, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review