Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Perspectives on uncertainty and risk : the PRIMA approach to decision support

Open access
van Asselt, M.B.A.·2021

Abstract

Acknowledgements. 1. Introduction and research methodology. 2. Integrated Assessment. 3A. Uncertainty. 3B. Risk. 4. Uncertainty and risk in perspective. 5. Pluralistic fRamework for Integrated uncertainty Management and risk Analysis (PRIMA). 6. Exploring the need for PRIMA: a case-study approach. 7. Searching for uncertainty in RIVM's Environmental Outlooks. 8. Exploring PRIMA's first steps in practice the case of the 5th Environmental Outlook. 9. Perspectives on uncertainty and risk: conclusion and discussion. Appendix 1: Letter to the Trouw editor. Appendix 2: Track record of DeKwaadsteniet affair. Appendix 3: Argumentation analysis schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26481/dis.20001012ma

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
van Asselt, M. B. A.
Published
2000-01-01
OpenAlex
W48121795
Cited by
218
References
0
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on uncertainty and risk : the PRIMA approach to decision support. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26481/dis.20001012ma
The paper
van Asselt, M. B. A. (2021). Perspectives on uncertainty and risk : the PRIMA approach to decision support. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20001012ma

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.